ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2536

Comparison of Quality-of-Life, Function and Psoriasis Measures in Minimal Disease Activity and DAS28 States in Routine Care of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Catherine Hughes, Nora Ng, Toby Garrood and Bruce Kirkham, Rheumatology, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis, quality of life and remission

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Outcomes, Outcome Measures, and Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often occurs with skin psoriasis (PsO). Disease activity can be measured using several tools including Minimal Disease Activity (MDA/VLMDA) or 28 joint disease activity (DAS28). The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) assess the severity of PsO. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly accepted as key outcome measures (new OMERACT guidelines) including the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). Our objective was to compare PROMs in MDA and DAS28 disease states, including severe psoriasis, defined as PASI >10 or DLQI>10 or Body Surface Area >10.

Methods:

Patients with PsA attending our center completed PROMs and had clinician assessment. The following data was recorded: age, diagnosis, MDA components, DAS28 components, PASI, DLQI, EQ-5D-3L and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI), in a IRB approved cross-sectional analysis. Statistics were performed using SPSS Version 23.

Results:

129 sequential patients attending between February and November 2016 were included. Population characteristics are outlined in Table 1. 82% of patients had psoriasis, with a DLQI score available for 88% (n=93). MDA and DAS28 low disease activity identified similar patients, with similar arthritis outcomes, generally better in MDA (Tables 1 and 2). Our population generally did not have high PASI (mean 1.38). DLQI scores were higher in active PsA. The DAS28 remission group had 11% of patients with a DLQI >10, in contrast the MDA group had fewer with DLQI >10 (3%).

Conclusion:

MDA and DAS28 measures identify patients with similar arthritis outcomes. Patients in MDA and low DAS28 states have lower DLQI values. MDA is associated with significantly fewer patients with high DLQI. This suggests that MDA identifies patients who have a better overall psoriatic disease outcome.

Table 1: Patient Characteristics, MDA and Very Low (VL)-MDA

Characteristics

VL-MDA N=19

MDA N=46

Not-MDA N=83

P Value

Age years

51 (19.4)

47 (13.44)

52 (14.15)

0.92 *

Gender (%F)

32% (6/19)

33% (15/46)

36% (30/83)

0.686**

Mean DAS28

1.6(0.46)

1.86 (0.54)

3.88 (1.25)

DAS28 remission

100% (19/19)

91%(42/46)

12%(10/83)

<0.0001 **

DAS28 2.6-3.2

0

4% (2/46)

17%(14/83)

0.388**

DAS28 3.2-5.1

0

0

53% (44/83)

DAS28 >5.1

0

0

18% (15/83)

EQ5D Utility Index

0.86

0.78

0.45

<0.0005 *

EQ5D VAS

84

79

50

<0.0005 *

PASI>10

0

0

5

0.222**

DLQI >10

0

3% (1/36)

34% (20/59)

0.001**

HAQ-DI

0.0789

0.22

1.32

<0.0005 *

VAS Pain (0-100)

15

25

63

<0.0005 *

P Value calculated comparing MDA and not-MDA groups using:*Mann Whitney U test; ** Chi Squared test

Table 2: MDA and QoL measures compared to DAS28 scores

Total number 127

DAS remission

N= 50

DAS 2.6-3.2

N=17

DAS 3.2-5.1

N= 45

DAS>5.1

N= 15

P Value

PsO

40/50 (80%)

15/17 (88%)

37/45(82%)

12/15(80%)

1.00**

MDA

80% (40/50)

18% (3/17)

2% (1/45)

0

0.000**

HAQ-DI

0.432

0.583

1.49

1.86

0.000*

EQ5D Utility Index

0.77

0.687

0.53

0.138

0.000*

EQ5D VAS

70

71

53.4

36

0.000*

VAS Pain 0-100

29

55

60

81

0.000*

PASI >10

1/50 (2%)

0

3/45 (7%)

1/15 (7%)

0.662**

DLQI >10

4/38 (11%)

3/13(23%)

8/32 (25%)

5/10 (50%)

0.033**

DLQI 5-10

8/38 (21%)

1/13 (8%)

8/32 (25%)

3/10 (30%)

DLQI <5

26/38(68%)

9/13(69%)

16/32(50%)

2/10 (20%)

P Value calculated comparing DAS28 remission and non DAS28 remission groups using: *Mann Whitney U; **chi squared test


Disclosure: C. Hughes, None; N. Ng, None; T. Garrood, None; B. Kirkham, Eli Lilly and Company, 2,Abbvie, 2,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,Arthritis Research UK, 2,Roche, 2,UCB, 2,Celgene, 9,Pfizer Inc, 9,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 9,Sandoz, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hughes C, Ng N, Garrood T, Kirkham B. Comparison of Quality-of-Life, Function and Psoriasis Measures in Minimal Disease Activity and DAS28 States in Routine Care of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-quality-of-life-function-and-psoriasis-measures-in-minimal-disease-activity-and-das28-states-in-routine-care-of-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-quality-of-life-function-and-psoriasis-measures-in-minimal-disease-activity-and-das28-states-in-routine-care-of-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology