ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2070

Evidence-Based Development of Criteria for Complete Response in Patients with Chronic Refractory Gout

Naomi Schlesinger1, Puja Khanna2, Anthony Yeo3 and Peter E. Lipsky4, 1Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, 2Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Horizon Pharma, Lake Forest, IL, 4AMPEL BioSolutions, LLC, Charlottesville, VA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: gout, remission and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: A Delphi exercise reached consensus on a definition for gout remission that included serum uric acid (sUA) <6 mg/dL, no flares, resolution of all tophi, limited pain, and low disease impact by patient global assessment (PGA).1 The frequency with which these criteria are achieved in response to treatment has not been assessed. Our study evaluated these criteria using results from patients with chronic refractory gout who received pegloticase (8 mg every 2 weeks), a mammalian recombinant uricase conjugated to polyethylene glycol approved for treatment of adults with chronic gout refractory to oral urate lowering therapy2.

Methods: The results from two identical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pegloticase were analyzed.2 Patients received 6 months of treatment with 8 mg of pegloticase or placebo, and responders were defined as those with persistent urate lowering2. Overall, 42% (n=36) of the patients who received pegloticase 8 mg every 2 weeks were responders in the RCTs and 34 continued in the open-label extension. Initially, individual patient data was reviewed to establish the frequency with which pegloticase responders met the proposed remission criteria.1 Subsequently, using mixed modelling, we determined the best criteria for a “complete response” (CR) using a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model to relate the time when a patient’s response was noted, assessed by patient global assessment (PGA), SF-36 bodily pain scores, visual analog scale pain levels, numbers of tender and swollen joints, number of flares, and the degree of tophus resolution controlling for repeated measures. Variables were eliminated by dropping the least statistically significant item. All components of the final model were statistically significant.

Results: Of 34 pegloticase responders, 29 (85.3%) met the published criteria for remission. However, comparison of various components of the composite criteria indicated weak or absent correlations. Mixed effects modelling defined the following criteria for a CR: sUA <6 mg/dL, resolution of all measured tophi, PGA ≤1, swollen joint count ≤1, and tender joint count ≤1. The mean time from the beginning of the RCT to reach CR criteria was 11.5 months. All patients who achieved a CR maintained it until the end of follow-up. The mean duration of CR was 507.4 days and there was a significant inverse relationship between the time to CR and the duration of the response (P=0.0008).

Conclusion:

These results defined criteria for a CR in individuals with chronic refractory gout treated with pegloticase, suggesting that, the majority of patients who persistently lower sUA, reach criteria for CR, and do so within 1 year from the initiation of therapy. CR persisted for the length of treatment.

This composite CR index can serve as an evidence-based target goal for a “Treat to Target” strategy in clinical practice and in future clinical trials.

1. deLautour H, et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68:667. 2. Sundy JS, et al. JAMA. 2011;306:711.


Disclosure: N. Schlesinger, AstraZeneca, 2,AstraZeneca, 2,AstraZeneca, Horizon, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, 5,AstraZeneca, Horizon, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, 5; P. Khanna, Ironwood, Horizon, AstraZeneca, 5; A. Yeo, Horizon Pharma, 5; P. E. Lipsky, Horizon Pharma, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schlesinger N, Khanna P, Yeo A, Lipsky PE. Evidence-Based Development of Criteria for Complete Response in Patients with Chronic Refractory Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evidence-based-development-of-criteria-for-complete-response-in-patients-with-chronic-refractory-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evidence-based-development-of-criteria-for-complete-response-in-patients-with-chronic-refractory-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology