ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1585

Role of Corticosteroids in Subclinical Atherosclerosis in SLE: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ehsan Rajabirostami1, Kam Newman2, Sreelakshmi Panginikkod1, Shahrzad Mohammadiankhansari1, Nader Mehri3, Roshanak Habibi4 and Manish Jain5, 1Internal Medicine, Presence Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, IL, 2Rheumatology, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, CA, 3Social Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 4Presence Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, IL, 5Rheumatology, Presence Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, IL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, corticosteroids and intima medial thickness, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II: Damage and Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Atherosclerosis in SLE results from a complex interplay between traditional risk factors, SLE-specific factors, chronic inflammation and multifaceted effects of SLE therapeutics. In particular, corticosteroids may exert a double-edged effect by increasing traditional risk factors on one hand and inhibiting the inflammatory process on the other. In this meta-analysis, we aim to determine the association between corticosteroids and subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE patients and investigate the influence of strength, duration and cumulative dose of steroids.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Scopus, MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE for articles published in English from January 1985 through June 2016 in adult age group. Studies were eligible if they presented the dose of steroid administered to the SLE group and used mean CIMT as evaluated by high-resolution ultrasound (surrogate marker of subclinical atherosclerosis). Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. All articles with multiple publications were considered for data extraction but only one was used for final analysis. The required data to estimate the effect-sizes associated with each study was extracted. Using Hedges’ random-effect model, the estimated effect-sizes were pooled together. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis and meta-regression technique. Publication bias was tested using funnel plot and Eggers test.

Results:

Out of 254 citations, 24 studies were eligible. Disease characteristics and quality score of the studies are shown in Table 1. The pooled effect size showed statistically significant increase in subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE patients (SMD=0.821, P=0.000; 95% CI, 0.512 to 1.22). In a univariate meta-regression model, corticosteroid consumption significantly increased the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE patients (B=0.018, P= 0.027; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.035). Result also showed, there was insignificant relationship between the duration as well as cumulative dose and the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE patient. Subgroup analysis showed that the above association of corticosteroid and subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE patients is not affected by the dose of the steroid.

Conclusion:

Our findings concluded that corticosteroids increase the risk of early atherosclerosis in SLE patients. We also found that subclinical atherosclerosis is not influenced by the strength, duration or cumulative dose of steroids. The biggest challenge to this analysis is the heterogeneity of the studies included. Further research is needed to better understand the adjusted effect of SLE disease activity in the role of steroids in subclinical atherosclerosis.

Table 1.

Study

Size

case

Size

control

Age (y) (case)

Age(y) (control)

SLE duration

Steroid Average Dose (mg/d)

Steroid Dosage

Steroid Consumption (%)

SLEDA[i]

NOS[ii]

1

Abdel-Wahab 2013

20

20

25.6

29.2

5.2

NA[iii]

H[iv]

100

23.6

7

2

Ajeganova 2015

111

111

48.6

48.8

9

4.3

L[v]

60.4

2

7

3

Cacciapaglia 2009

33

33

47

45

13

NA

L

94

14.4

7

4

Colombo 2009

80

80

42.6

40.1

15

NA

M[vi]

100

2.8

6

5

Elshishtawy 2012

50

40

23.06

23.36

2.29

19.9

M

100

28.16

6

6

Gheita 2012-13

92

30

30.18

28

5.83

13.91

M

91.3

8.585

7

7

Gheita 2012

45

30

26.13

27.37

3.68

22.33

H

100

7.31

6

8

Ghosh 2009

60

38

31

34

5

9

M

86.6

4

7

9

Jackson 2006

32

33

47.5

48

13

3.6

L

60

1.75

7

10

Jung 2014

102

52

38.8

38.1

6.5

2.6

L

73.5

4.4

8

11

Leeuw 2007

55

55

43

43

12

7.5

M

42

2

7

12

Mak 2011

55

55

40

40

4.5

13.28

M

87

7

9

13

Nowak 2012

16

13

44.4

43.8

6.5

NA

M

87.5

10

7

14

Ozgen 2011

22

29

34

38

4.1

7.1

L

91

8

7

15

Ozgen 2011

26

29

34

38

3.8

8.3

M

84.6

8.3

8

16

Raafat 2014

36

36

27.9

28.1

4.1

24.5

H

100

15.1

7

17

Roman 2003

197

197

44

44

12.1

10

M

90

4

8

18

Sato 2007

39

39

5.1

5.1

19

9.4

M

100

1.85

7

19

Shang 2008

32

32

46

43

11

8.6

M

93.75 (94)

1

7

20

Smrzova 2013

63

24

38.38

31

11.91

14.9

M

97

7.22

7

21

Somers 2012

95

38

37.6

39.3

NA

9.2

M

62.1

4

8

22

Valdivielso 2008

26

21

34

35

NA

5.11

L

61

5.58

6

23

Valer 2013

100

50

41.54

41.4

4.25

19.47

M

81

4

8

24

Zhang 2009

111

40

34.4

34.5

9.4

12.34

M

100

6

8



[i] SLE Disease Activity Index

[ii] Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

[iii] Not available

[iv] High doe

[v] Low dose

[vi] Medium dose


Disclosure: E. Rajabirostami, None; K. Newman, None; S. Panginikkod, None; S. Mohammadiankhansari, None; N. Mehri, None; R. Habibi, None; M. Jain, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rajabirostami E, Newman K, Panginikkod S, Mohammadiankhansari S, Mehri N, Habibi R, Jain M. Role of Corticosteroids in Subclinical Atherosclerosis in SLE: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/role-of-corticosteroids-in-subclinical-atherosclerosis-in-sle-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/role-of-corticosteroids-in-subclinical-atherosclerosis-in-sle-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology