ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1316

Risk of Preterm Delivery Associated with Perinatal Exposure to Dmards in Women with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Nicole W. Tsao1,2, Eric C. Sayre2, Mohsen Sadatsafavi1, J. Antonio Avina-Zubieta2,3, Stephanie Ensworth4 and Mary A. De Vera1,2, 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: DMARDs, drug safety, inflammatory arthritis, outcomes and pregnancy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Given the limited data on impacts of perinatal medication use, our objective was to investigate the association between conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) use preconception and during pregnancy and risk of preterm deliveries.

Methods: We linked population-based health data in British Columbia, Canada from 2002 to 2012 on all physician visits, hospital admissions, and dispensed medications with a perinatal registry. Essential data from this registry included date of conception according to ultrasound-confirmed gestational age or last menstrual period. We created a pregnancy cohort of women with inflammatory arthritis using a case definition of 2 outpatient physician ICD9 codes for RA, ankylosing spondylitis, JIA, PsA, or connective tissue diseases and adult systemic vasculitides, ³ 2 months and ² 2 years apart.  We grouped csDMARDs according to accepted safety profiles – antimalarials, gold, CSA, and SSZ (Group 1); and MTX, LEF, AZA, CYC, chlorambucil, penicillamine, MMF, and minocycline (Group 2) – and determined perinatal exposure over two periods: as binary use (yes/no) during the 90 days preconception and as time-dependent use during pregnancy from date of conception until delivery. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between csDMARDs exposure preconception and/or during pregnancy and risk of preterm delivery, defined as live births with gestational age (GA) < 37 weeks, while adjusting for baseline and time-dependent covariates. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to csDMARD groups.

Results: There were 610 pregnancies in 512 women and 5639 pregnancies in 4078 women with and without csDMARDs exposure, respectively (Table 1). There were 562 (10%) and 138 (23%) preterm deliveries in unexposed and exposed pregnancies, respectively, with mean GA at delivery at 38.5 weeks (SD 2.06) in unexposed pregnancies, 38.3 (2.46) in Group 1, and 37.1 (2.96) in Group 2. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for exposure to csDMARDs preconception and during pregnancy and risk of preterm delivery was 2.12 (95%CI 1.63-2.76) (Table 2). In subgroup analyses, the risk of preterm delivery was highest in those exposed to Group 2 csDMARDs during pregnancy (HR 3.92, 95%CI 1.45-10.62).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a risk of preterm delivery associated with exposure to csDMARDs preconception and during pregnancy. This may have been impacted by disease activity and differences in inflammatory arthritis types between exposure groups. Nonetheless, with mean GA of neonates approximating term delivery, it is important to consider the risks and benefits of medication use during pregnancy.

Table 1. Characteristics of pregnant women with inflammatory arthritis exposed and unexposed to csDMARDs preconception and during pregnancy

Characteristics

Exposed to csDMARDs

N (%)

Unexposed to csDMARDs

N (%)

512 women, 610 pregnancies

4078 women, 5369 pregnancies

Current pregnancy

Age at delivery (mean (SD))

32 (5)

31 (5)

Multiparous

335 (55)

3356 (60)

Obstetrical history

Prior preterm delivery

50 (8)

308 (5)

Prior spontaneous abortion

161 (27)

1424 (25)

Prior neonatal death

<5

34 (0.6)

Prior stillbirth

17 (3)

62 (1)

Prior low birth weight

26 (4)

162 (3)

Prior congenital anomaly

6 (1)

50 (1)

Inflammatory arthritis type

Rheumatoid arthritis

387 (63)

1402 (25)

Psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis

77 (13)

3366 (60)

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

28 (5)

73 (1)

Connective tissue diseases and adult systemic vasculitides

280 (46)

786 (14)

Ankylosing spondylitis

38 (6)

378 (7)

csDMARD use*

Group 1

499 (82)

–

Group 2

189 (31)

–

Other medication use#

Biologics

26 (4)

44 (0.8)

Glucocorticoids

211 (35)

211 (4)

Traditional NSAIDs

158 (26)

525 (9)

COX2 NSAIDs

45 (7)

62 (1)

Antidepressants

100 (17)

598 (11)

Anxiolytics

49 (8)

295 (5)

Comorbidities

Mood disorders

32 (5)

250 (4)

Anxiety

63 (10)

548 (10)

Asthma

3 (0.5)

30 (0.5)

*percentages do not add to 100 as each pregnancy can be exposed to more than one category of csDMARDs

#other medication use during 90 days preconception and/or during pregnancy

Table 2. Multivariable models of csDMARD use preconception and/or during pregnancy and risk of preterm deliveries

Models*

Exposure groups

Hazard ratio

95% Confidence Interval

Model 1

    All csDMARDs

Preconception only vs. unexposed

1.37

1.03-1.82

During pregnancy only vs. unexposed

1.93

0.80-4.65

Preconception AND during pregnancy vs. unexposed

2.12

1.63-2.76

Model 2

    Group 1 csDMARDs

Preconception only vs. unexposed

1.40

1.02-1.90

During pregnancy only vs. unexposed

1.86

0.77-4.48

Preconception AND during pregnancy vs. unexposed

1.87

1.40-2.49

Model 3

    Group 2 csDMARDs

Preconception only vs. unexposed

1.58

1.02-2.44

During pregnancy only vs. unexposed

3.92

1.45-10.62

Preconception AND during pregnancy vs. unexposed

2.64

1.75-3.98

*All models were adjusted for baseline covariates including maternal characteristics (maternal age, neighborhood income quintile, parity, number of visits to rheumatologist, hospitalizations, and maternal body mass index); obstetrical history (prior premature births, spontaneous abortions, low birth weight births, congenital anomalies, neonatal deaths, stillbirths, total prior hospital admissions, number of antenatal visits); use of medications (glucocorticoids, traditional NSAIDs, COX2 NSAIDs, biologic DMARDs, anxiolytics, antidepressants); and comorbidities (asthma, depression, anxiety). All models were also adjusted for time-dependent covariates during pregnancy, namely use of medications (traditional NSAIDs, COX2 NSAIDs, biologic DMARDs, anxiolytics, antidepressants)


Disclosure: N. W. Tsao, None; E. C. Sayre, None; M. Sadatsafavi, None; J. A. Avina-Zubieta, None; S. Ensworth, None; M. A. De Vera, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tsao NW, Sayre EC, Sadatsafavi M, Avina-Zubieta JA, Ensworth S, De Vera MA. Risk of Preterm Delivery Associated with Perinatal Exposure to Dmards in Women with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-preterm-delivery-associated-with-perinatal-exposure-to-dmards-in-women-with-inflammatory-arthritis-a-population-based-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-preterm-delivery-associated-with-perinatal-exposure-to-dmards-in-women-with-inflammatory-arthritis-a-population-based-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology