ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 219

Disparities in Patients’ Expectations of Foot and Ankle Surgery

Mackenzie T. Jones1, Elizabeth A. Cody1, Shirin A. Dey2, Jackie Szymonifka2, Michael L. Parks3, Lisa A. Mandl4, Susan M. Goodman5 and Scott J. Ellis6, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 4Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 5Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 6Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Orthopedics, Preoperative, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic factors and surgery

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

A previous study examining patients’ expectations of elective foot and ankle surgery found that race is significantly associated with expectations. In this study, using a patient-derived institutional Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey, we aimed to examine the relationship between patients’ preoperative expectations and census tract (CT) socioeconomic factors in addition to race.  

Methods:

All adult patients scheduled for elective foot or ankle surgery by one of six orthopedic surgeons were screened for inclusion between August 2015 and March 2016. Preoperatively, patients completed the Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey, which contains 23 expectations categories, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “I do not have this expectation” to “complete improvement expected”, with higher scores (range 1-23) indicating greater expectations. Using geocoding, individual-level registry data was linked to US census tracts data through patient addresses. Simple and multiple linear regression were used to model expectations scores as a function of individual race, and CT  median income,  Gini coefficient, and percentages of blacks, Hispanics, residents living below poverty, residents living alone, residents with insurance coverage, and residents with Medicaid coverage.  The multiple linear regression model used backward selection methodology, requiring 0.05 significance to remain in the final model. An interaction between race and CT poverty was assessed.

Results:

352 patients (mean age 55±14 years, 66% female) were included in this study. Factors that were significantly associated with higher expectations in univariate modeling were  non-Caucasian race, female sex, and census tract percentage of blacks, census tract percentage of Hispanics, census tract percentage of residents with Medicaid insurance, census tract poverty level, and census tract Gini coefficient (all p<0.05, Table 1). In multivariable modeling, females scored 5 points higher (5.00±1.93, p=0.01) on the Expectations Survey than males. Caucasians scored nearly 11 points lower (-10.98±3.13, p<0.001) than non-whites. There were no community CT variables that remained significant, and there was no interaction between race and CT poverty (p=0.7).

Conclusion:

Among patients undergoing diverse procedures in foot and ankle surgery, we found that female sex and non-Caucasian race were independently associated with higher expectations, but community social factors were not significant. These findings may help inform surgeons’ preoperative discussions as they address patients’ expectations. Future studies are needed to explore whether preoperative expectations scores correlate with postoperative satisfaction, and whether the factors that affect expectations also affect satisfaction.

 

Table 1

Univariate Factor

Beta coefficient ± SE

p-value

Age, per 10 years

-0.63 ± 0.69

0.358

Sex: female (reference=male)

4.73 ± 2.09

0.024

BMI, per 1 kg/m2

0.21 ± 0.17

0.220

Race: white (reference=non-white)

-12.48 ± 3.35

<0.001

Marital status: married (reference=not married)

-3.46 ± 2.09

0.100

FAOS* Pain, per 10 points

-2.40 ± 0.43

<0.001

FAOS Symptoms, per 10 points

-1.47 ± 0.44

<0.001

FAOS ADL, per 10 points

-2.57 ± 0.41

<0.001

FAOS Sports, per 10 points

-1.70 ± 0.33

<0.001

FAOS QoL, per 10 points

-2.76 ± 0.42

<0.001

SF-12 overall, per 10 points

-2.53 ± 0.85

0.004

   PCS, per 5 points

-2.69 ± 0.41

<0.001

   MCS, per 5 points

-1.14 ± 0.44

0.010

Census tract data

   Percent black, per 1 percent

0.19 ± 0.09

0.036

   Percent Hispanic, per 1 percent

0.22 ± 0.09

0.017

   Percent single mothers, per 1 percent

0.55 ± 0.46

0.237

   Percent live alone, per 1 percent

-0.07 ± 0.92

0.942

   Percent insured, per 1 percent

-0.32 ± 0.18

0.066

   Percent Medicaid, per 1 percent

0.42 ± 0.13

0.001

   Percent below poverty, per 1 percent

0.53 ± 0.18

0.003

   Median income, per $10,000

-0.36 ± 0.23

0.114

   Gini coefficient, per 10 percent

-3.39 ± 1.38

0.015

 

 

 

Multivariable Factor

Beta coefficient ± SE

p-value

Sex: female (reference=male)

5.00 ± 1.93

0.010

Race: white (reference=non-white)

-10.98 ± 3.13

<0.001

FAOS ADL, per 10 points

-1.50 ± 0.52

0.004

PCS, per 5 points

-1.71 ± 0.52

0.001

*FAOS = Foot and Ankle Outcome Score

 



Disclosure: M. T. Jones, None; E. A. Cody, None; S. A. Dey, None; J. Szymonifka, None; M. L. Parks, Zimmer Biomet, Inc., 5; L. A. Mandl, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2,American College of Physicians, 3,Up To Date, 7; S. M. Goodman, None; S. J. Ellis, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jones MT, Cody EA, Dey SA, Szymonifka J, Parks ML, Mandl LA, Goodman SM, Ellis SJ. Disparities in Patients’ Expectations of Foot and Ankle Surgery [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disparities-in-patients-expectations-of-foot-and-ankle-surgery/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disparities-in-patients-expectations-of-foot-and-ankle-surgery/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology