ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3234

Prevalence and Metric of Depression and Anxiety in Lupus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analys

Ahmed Moustafa1, Mohamed Hassanein2, Lihi Eder3, Joan E. Wither4, William Fung5, Panayiotis Lambiris6 and Zahi Touma4, 1Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 3Medicine, University of Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Anxiety, depression, meta-analysis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment VI: Quality of Life

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose:  To systematically review the literature on the: 1) prevalence of depression and anxiety in SLE patients and 2) metrics of depression and anxiety.  

Methods : This review was conducted based on the recommendation of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Protocols statement. A literature search (1954-2016) was performed in Ovid Medline, Embase, Psyc INFO and CINAHL for articles on the prevalence of depression and/or anxiety in adult SLE patients or on the metrics of depression/anxiety. Included studies were critically appraised and analyzed. The prevalence of depression and anxiety was studied for all instruments and whenever possible Pooled Prevalence (PP) was determined in the commonly used instruments [Centre for Epidemiological Studies – Depression (CES-D), Beck Depression/Anxiety Inventory (BDI/BAI), Hospital Anxiety/Depression Scales (HADS-D/A), Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression/Anxiety (HAM-D/A)].  

Results: A total of 4394 references were identified, 278 were selected for detailed review and 121 were included in the final analysis. Depression: PP of Depression was 35.2% (95% CI: 30.1, 40.5%) (Figure 1A) based on data from 70 studies in 23399 patients. Anxiety: PP of Anxiety was 24.2% (95% CI: 17.9, 31.2%) (Figure 1B) based on data from 39 studies in 4495 patients.   CES-D: was utilized in 13 studies in 1856 patients. Depression PP was 41.5% (95% CI: 35.1, 48.1%). BDI/BAI: was utilized in 14 studies in 1355 patients and 3 studies in 489 patients respectively. Depression PP was 39.9% (95% CI: 31.1, 49.1%) and Anxiety PP was 38.4% (95% CI: 34.2, 42.8%). HADS-D/A: was utilized in 14 studies in 1238 patients and 12 studies in 1099 patients respectively. Depression PP was 24.4% (95% CI: 19.1, 30.1%) and Anxiety PP was 38.3% (95% CI: 29.1, -47.9%). HAM-D/A: was utilized in 5 studies in 323 patients and 5 studies in 269 patients respectively. Depression PP was 43% (95% CI: 27.9, 58.7%) and Anxiety PP was 37.3% (95% CI: 31.7, 43.2%). We found high variability in the prevalence of depression and anxiety, and high statistical heterogeneity (I2> 75%) which is attributed to the: 1) lack of standardization in the metrics and definitions of depression and anxiety in SLE, and 2) variability in other demographics such as patients age, education levels and other factors that  associate/predict depression and/or anxiety.  

Conclusion: The prevalence of depression/anxiety is high in patients with SLE, ranging from 5.7% to 78.6% and 1.1% to 71.4%, respectively. The CES-D, BDI, HAM-D yielded a similar prevalence of depression, ranging between 27.9% and 49.1%, whereas the prevalence of depression with the HADS-D was lower.(24.4%). All metrics (BAI, HADS-A, HAM-A) of anxiety yielded a similar prevalence of anxiety prevalence ranging between 29.1% and 47.9%.

   


Disclosure: A. Moustafa, None; M. Hassanein, None; L. Eder, None; J. E. Wither, None; W. Fung, None; P. Lambiris, None; Z. Touma, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Moustafa A, Hassanein M, Eder L, Wither JE, Fung W, Lambiris P, Touma Z. Prevalence and Metric of Depression and Anxiety in Lupus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analys [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-and-metric-of-depression-and-anxiety-in-lupus-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analys/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prevalence-and-metric-of-depression-and-anxiety-in-lupus-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analys/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology