ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1426

Using Self-Reported Patient Experiences to Understand Patient Burden: Learnings from Digital Patient Communities in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Prashanth Sunkureddi1, Dawn Gibson2, Stephen Doogan3, John Heid4, Samir Benosman5 and Yujin Park6, 1Rheumatology, Clear Lake Rheumatology Center, Nassau Bay, TX, 2The Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 3Real Life Sciences, New York, NY, 4Kinapse, Inc, London, United Kingdom, 5Advisory Services, Kinapse, Inc, London, United Kingdom, 6Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), patient outcomes, quality of life and social media

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the spinal joints that can lead to severe, chronic pain and discomfort. There is a substantial disease burden on AS patients as they experience reduction in physical function, increased risk of unemployment, and increased direct and indirect health costs. This study aimed to better understand AS disease burden by describing patient experiences reported online and making comparison to existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to identify potential gaps.

Methods: Patient narratives between Jan 2010 and May 2016 from 52 online sources were collected; of the online sources, 46.6% were patient health networking sites, 24.9% disease-specific patient forums, 13.5% general health forums, 8.3% treatment reviews, 6.0% Doctor Q&A, and 0.6% mainstream social media. Using a natural language processing platform and manual curation, functional impairments and symptoms related to AS were evaluated and grouped into 6 high-level concepts: Social, Physical, Emotional, Cognitive, Role Activity (SPEC-R), and General (consisting of non-specific narratives, e.g. feeling unwell). These broad categories provided a starting point for organizing the data, with additional levels of detail added through sub-concept groupings. For comparison, the same SPEC-R categorization was applied to 5 AS-specific PRO instruments: ASQoL, ASAS-HI, BASDAI, HAQ-S, and BASFI (81 PRO questions curated, 40 total sub-concepts identified). PRO Instruments were then compared to key concepts and sub-concepts extracted from patient narratives.

Results: A total of 34,780 unguided narratives from 3,449 patients were collected for analysis: 86.7% of patient narratives correlated to the Physical concept, 32.5% to Emotional, 23.6% to Cognitive, 8.7% to Role Activity, 5.6% to Social, and 69.1% to General (Table 1). Some of the common concepts reported by patients, such as pain (65%), muscle weakness (20%), and musculoskeletal impairment (20%), depression (10%), and anger/frustration (5%) were effectively captured by more than 2 of the PRO instruments. However, commonly reported emotional concepts, such as anxiety (19%), and cognitive concepts, such as mental impairment (3.2%), were not captured in the PRO instruments evaluated in this analysis.

Conclusion: Analysis of self-reported patient narratives from online sources showed that some physical and emotional concepts, such as depression and pain, are effectively addressed by existing PRO instruments. However, the analysis also uncovered some concepts that may be important in addressing disease burden in AS patients but are not currently captured in existing PRO instruments. This study helps identify opportunities to refine existing PRO instruments.

SPEC-R Category

Top 3 Reported Sub-concepts

% of Total Reports

% within SPEC-R Category

ASAS-HI

ASQOL

BASDAI

BASFI

HAQ-S

Social   Lack of Independence

1.2%

23.9%

N

Y

N

Y

Y

Family Burden

0.9%

19.3%

N

Y

N

N

N

Relationships

0.8%

16.5%

Y

N

N

N

N

Physical   Pain

65.3%

75.3%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Energy Levels

19.9%

23.2%

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Musculoskeletal Impairment*

19.9%

22.9%

Y

N

Y

N

Y

Emotional   Anxiety

19.1%

58.8%

N

N

N

N

N

Depression

9.9%

30.5%

Y

Y

N

N

N

Anger/Frustration

5.4%

16.7%

Y

Y

N

N

N

Cognitive   Mental Impairment**

3.2%

13.6%

N

N

N

N

N

Impulsivity

2.9%

12.4%

N

N

N

N

N

Balance/Coordination

2.9%

12.1%

Y

N

N

N

Y

Role Activity   Performance at Work/School

3.0%

34.6%

N

N

N

N

Y

Unemployment/Dropped out of School

1.7%

19.9%

N

N

N

N

N

Absence from Work/School

1.3%

       15.0%

N

Y

N

N

N

Legend: Cells with the letter “N” indicate that the listed sub-concept is not captured by the PRO tool being evaluated.  Cells with the letter “Y” indicate that the listed sub-concept is captured by the PRO tool being evaluated. * “Musculoskeletal Impairment” refers to stiffness, swelling, and inflexibility. ** “Mental Impairment” does not encompass “Concentration,” as that sub-concept was captured separately.

 


Disclosure: P. Sunkureddi, None; D. Gibson, None; S. Doogan, None; J. Heid, None; S. Benosman, None; Y. Park, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sunkureddi P, Gibson D, Doogan S, Heid J, Benosman S, Park Y. Using Self-Reported Patient Experiences to Understand Patient Burden: Learnings from Digital Patient Communities in Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-self-reported-patient-experiences-to-understand-patient-burden-learnings-from-digital-patient-communities-in-ankylosing-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/using-self-reported-patient-experiences-to-understand-patient-burden-learnings-from-digital-patient-communities-in-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology