ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 931

Rates of Lipid Testing and Statin Prescriptions Among SLE and Diabetes Mellitus Patients in a Nationwide Medicaid Cohort

Sarah K. Chen1, Medha Barbhaiya2, Michael A. Fischer3, Hongshu Guan4, Tzu-Chieh Lin2, Candace H. Feldman5, Brendan M. Everett6 and Karen H. Costenbader2, 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 6Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, lipids and statins, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Health Services Research I: Workforce and Quality of Care in Rheumatology

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:  We have recently found that rates of myocardial infarction (MI) are similar among individuals with SLE and those with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a nationwide cohort of Medicaid recipients. Given high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks in both SLE and DM patients, lipid testing is widely advocated for both groups. We investigated rates of lipid testing and statin prescriptions among SLE and DM patients within Medicaid.

Methods:  Within Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), with billing claims from 2007-2010 for patients from the 29 most populous US states, we identified patients aged 18-65 years with prevalent SLE (>3 ICD-9 codes for SLE, >30 days apart), and a 1:2 age- and sex-matched DM cohort (>3 ICD-9 codes for DM, >30 days apart). We required 6 months of continuous Medicaid enrollment (baseline period) prior to the 3rd diagnosis code (index date). Subjects were followed from index date until death, Medicaid disenrollment or end of follow-up (12/31/2010). Within claims, we used CPT codes to identify lipid testing and NDC codes to identify statin prescriptions. We calculated rates per 100 person-years for lipid testing (>1 per person) and statin prescriptions (> 1 per person), and rate ratios (with 95% CIs) adjusted for baseline demographics and CVD using Poisson regression to compare rates (DM=referent).

Results:  32,089 SLE patients were matched to 64,178 DM patients; 92% were female and mean age was 41.3 (+ 12.1) years in both cohorts. Mean years of follow-up from index date was 1.68 (+1.03) for SLE, and 1.81 (+1.08) for DM. Baseline CVD covariates for SLE vs. DM cohorts were similar for MI (0.90 vs. 0.67%), angina (2.19 vs. 2.08%), old MI (0.89 vs. 0.67%), PCI (2.29 vs. 1.61%), CABG (0.18 vs. 0.12%), CVA (2.23 vs. 0.14%), and presence of any any CVD (4.62 vs. 3.57%). Rates (per 100 person years) of lipid testing increased from 22.2 to 44.1 for SLE and 38.2 to 59.1 for DM and statin prescription increased from 7.0 to 23.4 for SLE and 24.6 to 57.9 for DM between 2007 and 2010. Unadjusted rates (per 100 person years) for lipid testing were 25.8 (95% CI 25.3-26.3) for SLE and 41.6 (95% CI 41.1-42.0) for DM, and for statin prescription were 9.1 (95% CI 8.8-9.4) for SLE and 27.6 (95% CI 27.3-28.0) for DM. The highest rates of lipid testing and statin prescriptions were found among Asians and lowest rates were seen among Native Americans for both SLE and DM. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, sex, region, socioeconomic status, calendar year, and CVD at baseline, the rate ratios in SLE compared to DM patients were 0.61 (95% CI 0.60-0.63) for lipid testing and 0.32 (95% CI 0.31-0.34) for statin prescriptions.

Conclusion: Rates for lipid testing and statin prescriptions increased in both SLE and DM cohorts during the study period and were highest among older patients and those with baseline CVD. Although DM and SLE confer similar risk of CVD, in this cohort, lipid testing rates were 40% lower and statin prescription rates were 70% lower in patients with SLE compared to DM.


Disclosure: S. K. Chen, None; M. Barbhaiya, None; M. A. Fischer, None; H. Guan, None; T. C. Lin, None; C. H. Feldman, None; B. M. Everett, None; K. H. Costenbader, UpToDate, 7.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chen SK, Barbhaiya M, Fischer MA, Guan H, Lin TC, Feldman CH, Everett BM, Costenbader KH. Rates of Lipid Testing and Statin Prescriptions Among SLE and Diabetes Mellitus Patients in a Nationwide Medicaid Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-lipid-testing-and-statin-prescriptions-among-sle-and-diabetes-mellitus-patients-in-a-nationwide-medicaid-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rates-of-lipid-testing-and-statin-prescriptions-among-sle-and-diabetes-mellitus-patients-in-a-nationwide-medicaid-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology