ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 759

Gene Signature for Glucocorticoid, from in Vitro to In Vivo

Yanhua Sarah Hu1, Somnath Bandyopadhyay1, Deborah Furst1, A Johnsen1, Robert Latek1, Steven G. Nadler2 and Julie Carman3, 1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 2Immunosciences Translational Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 3Discovery Translational Sciences Group, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: bioinformatics and steroids, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster I: Clinical Trial Design and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Steroids are widely used in clinical practice for treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and can have a strong effect on immune cells in Whole Blood (WB), especially B cells and T-cells. Steroids are often used as background medication during clinical trials of SLE drugs and therefore can easily confound efficacy end points associated with therapies targeting B cells and T cells in the trials. Moreover, response to steroids might vary from individual to individual and might not completely agree with protocol steroid usage. Our goal is to create a gene signature as an objective measure of steroid response that can be used in SLE trials to aid in the interpretation of potential confounding steroid effects.

Methods: We conducted 5 in vitro experiments where PBMCs from normal healthy volunteers were treated with prednisolone. Differential gene expression analysis identified genes that were up regulated by prednisolone treatment, and 64 common genes were identified as a potential prednisolone gene signature. Composite scores of the prednisolone signature were calculated using the Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm (Barbie et al., 2009) for WB samples treated in vitro with prednisolone. The same was done for whole blood samples from normal healthy subjects who had in vivo administration of either a selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist (SEGRA) or prednisolone in a phase I study. The prednisolone signature was further investigated in baseline WB samples of SLE patients from a multicenter, exploratory, phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial, and signature scores were compared to neutrophil counts and protocol steroid usage.

Results: Both the in vitro and in vivo studies showed the high specificity of the prednisolone signature. When applied to WB gene expression data from SLE patients, the prednisolone signature scores were positively correlated with neutrophil counts (CBC) in WB, and negatively correlated with in vitro derived T cell and B cell signature scores. Both of these observations can be explained by the steroid mechanism of action. Steroid signature scores did not completely correlate with protocol steroid usage.

Conclusion: We identified a highly specific steroid gene signature that can be used to account for effects of steroids in global clinical trials where PAX gene tubes are routinely collected.

Figure 1: Prednisolone signature scores increased in a dose responsive manner in GR compound trial.

Figure 2: Prednisolone signature scores significantly correlate with netrophil counts in WB from baseline SLE patients  


Disclosure: Y. S. Hu, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; S. Bandyopadhyay, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; D. Furst, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; A. Johnsen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; R. Latek, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; S. G. Nadler, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; J. Carman, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hu YS, Bandyopadhyay S, Furst D, Johnsen A, Latek R, Nadler SG, Carman J. Gene Signature for Glucocorticoid, from in Vitro to In Vivo [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gene-signature-for-glucocorticoid-from-in-vitro-to-in-vivo/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gene-signature-for-glucocorticoid-from-in-vitro-to-in-vivo/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology