ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 213

Prophylaxis for Infusion Reactions to Pegloticase: An Analyis of Two Different Corticosteroid Pre-Infusion Regimens in US Community Rheumatology Practices

Amar Majjhoo1, Kome Okposo2 and Michael Zdanis3, 1Shores Rheumatology, St. Clair Shores, MI, 2Horizon Pharma, Lake Forest, IL, 3Cetus Group, LLC, Towson, MD

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: gout, infusions and patient outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies - Poster I: Clinical Practice

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Corticosteroids are commonly utilized, along with other agents in clinical practice for pre-infusion prophylaxis prior to the administration of therapeutic biologic proteins. Two steroids, methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone, are commonly used.  Because of the differing characteristics of these two agents, a chart review evaluating outcomes was performed.

Methods: Nineteen sites completed a retrospective chart review of pegloticase treated gout patients who completed at least three (3) infusions since 1/1/2012. Pegloticase is typically administered at 8 mg every 2 weeks, the FDA approved dose. Data collected included demographics, gout history, contraindications to both infusion reaction prophylaxis and gout flare prophylaxis medications, pre and post treatment serum uric acid (sUA) level, and prior gout treatment. This analysis includes data from 92 patients. Data were analyzed using multiple logistic regression, with number of infusions as a response variable and age, sUA prior to the last infusion, type of infusion prophylaxis corticosteroid (hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone) as treatment outcome predictor variables.

Results: Patient characteristics are similar to the typical pegloticase treated population.

Use of methylprednisolone as compared to hydrocortisone as pre-infusion prophylaxis was a significant (p<.001) predictor of pegloticase therapy duration (number of infusions). Furthermore, the mean number of infusions when methylprednisolone was used (8.48) was significantly higher than when hydrocortisone was used (4.93) (p<.001). As previously published, serum uric acid (sUA) drawn immediately prior to infusion was also a significant predictor of continued therapy and remains a key determinant for sustained pegloticase infusions. There was no significant difference between sUA levels prior to initiation of pegloticase therapy for these two groups.

Conclusion: Data from this retrospective chart review indicates that methylprednisolone pre-infusion therapy may allow for longer pegloticase therapy duration as compared with hydrocortisone. However, this modality imposes a significantly higher glucocorticoid load that may suppress symptoms of an infusion reaction rather than inhibit pegloticase drug antibody formation. The long term use of methylprednisolone prophylaxis may result in glucocorticoid related adverse effects. Methylprednisolone use as compared to hydrocortisone for infusion prophylaxis needs further study to determine efficacy and long-term safety.


Disclosure: A. Majjhoo, Horizon Pharma, Inc., 5,Horizon Pharma, Inc., 8; K. Okposo, Horizon Pharma, Inc, 3; M. Zdanis, Horizon Pharma, Inc., 5,Amgen, Inc., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Majjhoo A, Okposo K, Zdanis M. Prophylaxis for Infusion Reactions to Pegloticase: An Analyis of Two Different Corticosteroid Pre-Infusion Regimens in US Community Rheumatology Practices [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prophylaxis-for-infusion-reactions-to-pegloticase-an-analyis-of-two-different-corticosteroid-pre-infusion-regimens-in-us-community-rheumatology-practices/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/prophylaxis-for-infusion-reactions-to-pegloticase-an-analyis-of-two-different-corticosteroid-pre-infusion-regimens-in-us-community-rheumatology-practices/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology