ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 208

Examination of Serum Uric Acid (sUA) Lowering and Safety with Extended Lesinurad + Allopurinol Treatment in Subjects with Gout

Kenneth Saag1, Michael A. Becker2, Chris Storgard3, Maple Fung3, Jia Hu3 and Thomas Bardin4, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 3Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 4Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Allopurinol, Febuxostat, gout, hyperuricemia and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies - Poster I: Clinical Practice

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Two replicate, randomized, core Phase III trials (CLEAR 1 & 2) reported significantly more subjects treated with lesinurad 200 mg (LESU200) or 400 mg (LESU400), combined with allopurinol (ALLO), achieved target sUA <6.0 mg/dL at 6 and 12 months than with ALLO alone (P<0.0001).1,2 The safety profile of LESU200+ALLO was comparable to ALLO alone, except for higher incidences of predominantly reversible serum creatinine (sCr) elevations. Objectives: Assess long-term safety and efficacy of LESU+ALLO therapy in subjects enrolled in the CLEAR 1 and 2 extension study (NCT01808131).

Methods: Efficacy was assessed for those completing the core study and either continuing core LESU+ALLO treatment (200CONT, 400CONT) or crossing over into extension studies from core ALLO alone to ALLO+LESU200 (200CROSS) or LESU400 (400CROSS). Core LESU200+ALLO or LESU400+ALLO subjects and 200CONT and 400CONT extension groups are reported for safety. Efficacy endpoints included proportion of subjects with target sUA <6.0 mg/dL and mean sUA levels. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were calculated as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs; subjects with events per 100 person-years).  

Results: For efficacy, 200CONT (n=239) and 400CONT (n=232) groups receiving treatment for up to 24 months, and 200CROSS (n=121) and 400CROSS (n=122) groups, receiving treatment for up to 12 months, were analyzed. Proportion of subjects with sUA <6.0 mg/dL during core and extension are shown (Figure). Mean (SD) sUA (mg/dL) for 200CONT, 200CROSS, 400CONT and 400CROSS groups, respectively, were 6.96 (1.14), 6.92 (1.33), 6.80 (1.20) and 6.99 (1.14) at baseline of core studies, and 5.71 (1.80), 6.68 (1.57), 5.06 (1.94) and 6.68 (1.38) at end of 12-month core studies. After 12 months in the extension study when all patients received LESU, mean (SD) sUA (mg/dL) was 5.75 (1.77), 5.78 (1.92), 5.01 (1.95) and 5.25 (1.77), respectively. For safety, a pooled analysis on a total of 405 (LESU200) and 401 (LESU400) subjects receiving lesinurad in combination with ALLO from the core studies was conducted. During the core and extension study period, EAIRs of TEAEs and serious TEAEs at any time were 54.2 and 5.8 for LESU200 and 57.2 and 8.3 for LESU400. EAIRs of renal-related TEAEs and serious renal-related TEAEs were 7.4 and 0.5 for LESU200 and 14.2 and 0.8 for LESU400. EAIRs of kidney stone TEAEs were 0.5 and 2.0 for LESU200 and LESU400, respectively. EAIRs of sCr elevations ≥1.5x baseline was 7.8 and 17.0 for LESU200 and LESU400, respectively. The majority of elevations (91.7% and 87.8%, respectively) were resolved by analysis cut-off.

Conclusion: Subjects treated with LESU+ALLO therapy through 2 years continued to be at sUA target; those crossing from ALLO monotherapy had increased proportions reach target. Safety during continued treatment in the extension studies was consistent with the profile observed in the core studies.

 


Disclosure: K. Saag, Takeda, Horizon, Ardea/AstraZeneca, 2,Takeda, Horizon, Ardea/AstraZeneca, 5; M. A. Becker, Takeda, Ardea/AstraZeneca, Ironwood, Horizon, 2,Takeda, Ardea/AstraZeneca, Ironwood, Horizon, CymaBay, Pfizer, SelectaBio, 5; C. Storgard, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., a member of the AstraZeneca Group, 3; M. Fung, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., a member of the AstraZeneca Group, 3; J. Hu, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., a member of the AstraZeneca Group, 3; T. Bardin, Ipsen, 2,Menarini, 2,AstraZeneca, 5,Ipsen, 5,Menarini, 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Savient, 5,Sobi, 5,Takeda, 5,Cymabay, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Saag K, Becker MA, Storgard C, Fung M, Hu J, Bardin T. Examination of Serum Uric Acid (sUA) Lowering and Safety with Extended Lesinurad + Allopurinol Treatment in Subjects with Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/examination-of-serum-uric-acid-sua-lowering-and-safety-with-extended-lesinurad-allopurinol-treatment-in-subjects-with-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/examination-of-serum-uric-acid-sua-lowering-and-safety-with-extended-lesinurad-allopurinol-treatment-in-subjects-with-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology