ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2742

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in a Latin American Subpopulation of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pooled Phase 3 Analysis

Cristiano Zerbini1, Sebastiao Radominski2, Mario H. Cardiel3, Oswaldo Castañeda4, Ferope Romero5, Gustavo Citera6, Oscar Neira7, Dario Ponce de Leon8, Elaine Hoffman9 and Ricardo Rojo10, 1Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 3Centro de Investigacion Clinica de Morelia, Morelia, Mexico, 4Clínica Angloamericana, Lima, Peru, 5Hospital Arzobispo Loayza, Lima, Peru, 6Rheumatology, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 7Hospital del Salvador, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile, 8Pfizer Inc, Lima, PA, Peru, 9Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 10Pfizer Inc, New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: DMARDs, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), tofacitinib and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor
for the treatment of RA. This post-hoc pooled analysis was designed to assess
the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, as monotherapy or combination therapy
with nonbiologic DMARDs, in Latin American (LA) patients with an inadequate
response to prior DMARDs.

Methods:
Phase 3 data were pooled from LA patients receiving
tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID or placebo as monotherapy (ORAL Solo
[NCT00814307]) or combination therapy (ORAL Scan [NCT00847613], ORAL Sync
[NCT00856544] and ORAL Standard [NCT00853385]). Patients included in the
analysis were from Brazil, Dominican Republic, Colombia, Mexico, Chile, Peru,
Argentina, Venezuela and Costa Rica. Efficacy outcomes assessed at 3 months
were ACR20, 50 and 70 responses, and the health assessment questionnaire –
disability index (HAQ-DI). Adverse events (AE) and clinical laboratory
parameters were also assessed.

Results:
451 patients were included in the pooled
analysis with a mean age (range) of 49.2 (18-75) years in the combination
therapy arm and 50.4 (22-77) years for monotherapy. Tofacitinib
5 and 10 mg BID as monotherapy or combination therapy had higher ACR20, 50 and
70 response rates than placebo, with similar response rates between monotherapy
and combination therapy for both doses of tofacitinib (Table). Mean change from
baseline in HAQ-DI score was similar for monotherapy and combination therapy
with either dose. Adverse events occurred more
frequently with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID compared with placebo, and
numerically more events with combination therapy were noted compared with
monotherapy in some parameters (Table). Seventeen tofacitinib‑treated patients
withdrew due to adverse events (monotherapy, 4; combination, 13), and four
patients withdrew due to infection (monotherapy, 1; combination, 3). Patients receiving
combination therapy were more likely to develop elevations in liver enzymes. No
patients developed severe neutropenia or lymphopenia, with either monotherapy
or combination therapy.

Conclusion:
In this short-term post-hoc analysis of
pooled, Phase 3 data from LA patients with RA, tofacitinib demonstrated similar
efficacy as monotherapy or combination therapy and patients on tofacitinib
monotherapy appeared to have fewer discontinuations due to adverse events and fewer
elevations in liver enzymes compared with combination therapy over Months 0-3. These
data are consistent with data from the global population of tofacitinib-treated
patients.1

Reference:
1. Keystone et al. Ann Rheum Dis.
2013;72(S3):242.

 

Table. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes Over 3 Months

Parameter

Monotherapy

Combination

 

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

 

N=62

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

 

N=68

Placebo

 

N=36

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

 

N = 118

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

 

N=112

Placebo

 

N=55

ACR20 response rate, n (%)

43 (69.4)

53 (81.5)

12 (37.5)

76 (70.4)

76 (73.8)

16 (33.3)

ACR50 response rate, n (%)

29 (46.8)

30 (46.2)

6 (18.8)

51 (47.2)

54 (52.4)

9 (18.8)

ACR70 response rate, n (%)

12 (19.4)

13 (20.0)

4 (12.5)

19 (17.6)

26 (25.2)

1 (2.1)

HAQ-DI, mean change from baseline (SD)

-0.58 (0.70)

-0.68 (0.63)

-0.26 (0.58)

-0.66 (0.67)

-0.82 (0.63)

-0.32 (0.54)

AEs, n (%)

46 (74.2)

56 (82.4)

27 (75.0)

100 (84.7)

97 (86.6)

39 (70.9)

Discontinuations due to AEs, n (%)

2 (3.2)

2 (2.9)

1 (2.8)

5 (4.2)

8 (7.1)

2 (3.6)

Discontinuation due to infection, n

0

1

0

2

1

0

Serious infection, n (%)

0

1 (1.5)

0

2 (1.7)

3 (2.7)

0

Neutropenia <500cells/mm3, n

0

0

0

0

0

0

Lymphopenia <500 cells/mm3, n

0

0

0

0

0

0

AST, n (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>1 ULN

7 (11.3)

7 (10.3)

0

21 (17.8)

24 (22.0)

5 (9.1)

 

>2 ULN

2 (3.2)

0

0

0

2 (1.8)

0

 

>3 ULN

0

0

0

0

0

0

ALT, n (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>1 ULN

7 (11.3)

6 (8.8)

1 (2.8)

28 (23.7)

21 (19.3)

5 (9.1)

 

>2 ULN

2 (3.2)

2 (2.9)

0

2 (1.7)

5 (4.6)

0

 

>3 ULN

0

0

0

0

2 (1.83)

0

LDL, mean mg/dL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baseline

107.82

107.85

108.15

107.21

108.27

119.71

 

Month 3

124.00

127.33

111.90

125.03

126.87

115.91

HDL, mean mg/dL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Baseline

59.52

59.90

59.28

57.29

55.95

56.31

 

Month 3

63.27

65.98

52.91

58.76

60.87

52.38

All data are at 3 months unless otherwise stated.

ACR, American College of Rheumatology response rate; AE, adverse event;  ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HAQ-DI, health assessment questionnaire – disability index; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; ULN, upper limit of normal

 


Disclosure: C. Zerbini, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5; S. Radominski, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Roche and Sanofi, 5,Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Roche and Sanofi, 8,Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Roche and Sanofi, 9; M. H. Cardiel, Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Infinity, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, 8,Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Infinity, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, 9; O. Castañeda, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, IQfarma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Periñán, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Roemmers, UCB Pharma, 8,AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, IQfarma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Periñán, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Roemmers, UCB Pharma, 9; F. Romero, None; G. Citera, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Pfizer Inc, 1,AbbVie, 1; O. Neira, Abbvie, Bristol Squibb Myer, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, 9,Abbvie, Bristol Squibb Myer, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, 8; D. Ponce de Leon, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; E. Hoffman, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; R. Rojo, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zerbini C, Radominski S, Cardiel MH, Castañeda O, Romero F, Citera G, Neira O, Ponce de Leon D, Hoffman E, Rojo R. Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in a Latin American Subpopulation of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pooled Phase 3 Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-versus-combination-therapy-in-a-latin-american-subpopulation-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-pooled-phase-3-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-tofacitinib-monotherapy-versus-combination-therapy-in-a-latin-american-subpopulation-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-pooled-phase-3-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology