ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2333

Patients’ Prioritization of Patient-Centered Education and Research Topics in Rheumatic Disease

Phillip Higginbotham1, Bernadette Johnson2, Ronan O'Beirne1, Monica Safford1, Seth Ginsberg3, Ben Nowell4 and Jeffrey R. Curtis1, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3CreakyJoints, New York, NY, 4Creaky Joints/Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Education, patient, registry and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster III: Patient Reported Outcomes, Patient Education and Preferences

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: While healthcare provider priorities
often coalesce around clinical concerns, little has been done to explore which concerns
are the most pressing educational concerns among the rheumatic disease patient community.
This study conducted a cross-sectional analysis elicited by rheumatic disease
patients using nominal groups to identify the set of topics most relevant to
patients regarding their disease and care. Items were rank-ordered according to
importance and used to identify the educational concerns with which rheumatic
disease patients most identify.

Methods: Participants were recruited from within
the membership registry of the rheumatology patient community, CreakyJoints, to
participate in one of four nominal groups held in June 2015.  Each of the four groups
generated a set of educational topics or questions (‘items’), and then
rank-ordered them within each focus group.  We manually reviewed all items to
aggregate them into common topic groups, de-duplicating redundant items, and categorizing
the topic groups in to themes according to their highest patient-ranked order.

Results: Among the 31 participants distributed
across 4 nominal groups, mean (SD) age was 52.5 (9.8) years with 94% being women. 
Participant diseases included rheumatoid arthritis (74%), osteoarthritis (29%),
osteoporosis (29%), fibromyalgia (23%), lupus (16%), ankylosing spondylitis (13%),
and psoriatic arthritis (10%).   Overall, 98 educational topics were suggested by
the four groups, de-duplicated to 44 unique topic groups, which then were grouped
into 14 representative themes. Themes consisted of 2-15 topic groups with each topic
group encompassing 1-8 individual items.  “Lifestyle changes and patient
environment modifications” was the most valued theme, receiving 14% of votes. Medication
data (drug dosing, interactions, performance, etc.), physician selection, and knowledge
of disease/disease progression were also strongly emphasized with voting rank
scores of 12%, 11%, and 10%, respectively.  Themes of least interest included friend/family/community
support, financial concerns (including insurance), and social interactions, which
held vote percentages of 3%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. 

Conclusion: Patients with rheumatic diseases are concerned
about a variety of topics, which include lifestyle changes/patient environment
modifications, medication data, and physician choice. Patient-centered research
should maximally respond to addressing questions of importance to patients, and
this survey is a first step in identifying and prioritizing the topics that
matter most to patients.

Table 1: Top-ranked rheumatic disease educational
concern themes with topic group and item examples.

 


Disclosure: P. Higginbotham, None; B. Johnson, None; R. O'Beirne, None; M. Safford, None; S. Ginsberg, None; B. Nowell, None; J. R. Curtis, Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Higginbotham P, Johnson B, O'Beirne R, Safford M, Ginsberg S, Nowell B, Curtis JR. Patients’ Prioritization of Patient-Centered Education and Research Topics in Rheumatic Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-prioritization-of-patient-centered-education-and-research-topics-in-rheumatic-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patients-prioritization-of-patient-centered-education-and-research-topics-in-rheumatic-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology