ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2312

Patient Preferences for Total Knee Replacement Surgery:  Two Year Follow-up  

Ernest Vina1, Di Ran2, Erin Ashbeck2, Said Ibrahim3, Michael J. Hannon4, Jin Zhou5 and C. Kent Kwoh1, 1Rheumatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 2Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 3Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Decision analysis, Joint replacement, longitudinal studies and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster III: Patient Reported Outcomes, Patient Education and Preferences

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Patients’ preferences for total knee replacement (TKR) may determine actual receipt of TKR and may also change over time.  Yet, no study has longitudinally evaluated the treatment preferences regarding joint replacement of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).  Our objectives were to evaluate the consistency of patients’ preferences for TKR with receipt of TKR surgery, and to assess patient characteristics that may influence change in willingness to undergo TKR over 2 years.

Methods:

Structured interviews were conducted to determine the socio-demographic data, clinical characteristics, and treatment preferences (i.e. willingness to undergo TKR) of patients with knee OA.  Willingness was measured using a Likert scale ranging from -2 (definitely not willing) to +2 (definitely willing).  Consultation with an orthopedic surgeon and receipt of TKR surgery were ascertained by medical record reviews and structured interviews at 6 months and at 2 years.  Logistic regression models were conducted to assess the association between willingness and consultation with an orthopedic surgeon (or receipt of TKR), adjusted for age, sex, race, education, recruitment site, income, insurance, social support, and baseline WOMAC score.  Mixed models for repeated measures were used to estimate the effects of age, sex, race, social support, change in WOMAC subscale scores, and orthopedic surgical consult on change in willingness over 2 years.

Results:

At baseline, 589 were willing, and 215 were unsure or not willing to undergo TKR surgery.  Willing participants, compared to those who were unwilling, were more often White (69.4% vs. 48.4%), with more than a high school education (60.8% vs. 47.0%), employed (39.1% vs. 26.5%), and had a lower WOMAC total score (46.05 ± 16.12 vs. 50.37 ± 15.42).  At 2-year follow-up, baseline willingness was not associated with having seen an orthopedic surgeon (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI [0.62, 1.29]) after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables.   The odds of having TKR was twice as high among those who were willing to have the procedure at baseline, compared to all others, but this was not a statistically significant difference (adjusted OR 2.04, 95% CI [0.92, 4.53]).  

There was a general decline in willingness to undergo TKR over the follow-up period.  Among those who were willing to undergo TKR at baseline, only 66.5% were still willing 2 years later.  This decline in willingness was less among those who had a greater increase (> median) in WOMAC disability scores (adjusted Δ -0.34, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.20]) than those who had minimal change (≤ median) in their WOMAC disability scores (adjusted Δ -0.51, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.37]) (p=0.08).  The decline in willingness was also less among those who had seen an orthopedic surgeon (adjusted Δ -0.32, 95% CI [-0.46, -0.17]) than those who did not during the study period (adjusted Δ -0.51, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.38]) (p=0.05).  Other patient characteristics did not influence changes in willingness.

Conclusion:

Patients’ preferences for TKR were not consistent with utilization of TKR surgery over two years of follow-up.  Willingness to undergo TKR declined over time, but this decrease was mitigated by worsening OA-related disability and by consultation with an orthopedic surgeon.


Disclosure: E. Vina, None; D. Ran, None; E. Ashbeck, None; S. Ibrahim, None; M. J. Hannon, None; J. Zhou, None; C. K. Kwoh, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vina E, Ran D, Ashbeck E, Ibrahim S, Hannon MJ, Zhou J, Kwoh CK. Patient Preferences for Total Knee Replacement Surgery:  Two Year Follow-up   [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preferences-for-total-knee-replacement-surgery-two-year-follow-up/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-preferences-for-total-knee-replacement-surgery-two-year-follow-up/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology