ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2261

Association Between Musculoskeletal Pain, Fat Mass and Fat Free Mass: Results from a Population-Based Study

Tiffany K. Gill1, Tom P. Walsh2,3, E. Michael Shanahan4 and Catherine Hill5,6, 1Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, 3Podiatry, Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 4Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, 5The Health Observatory, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 6Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), Musculoskeletal, pain and population studies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III (ACR): Gout and Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Conditions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Musculoskeletal pain has been shown to commonly occur at multiple sites. This is likely to have a greater impact on abilities to undertake activities of daily living, work and quality of life in general. While obesity has been shown to impact on the occurrence of musculoskeletal conditions, body composition may also play a role. Few studies have examined the association between body composition and multiple pain sites although a recent study of 133 participants demonstrated that fat mass and fat mass index were associated with pain at a greater number of weight-bearing sites1. The aim of this study was to examine the association between pain sites and pain at weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing sites.

Methods: The North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS) is a longitudinal cohort study with three stages of data collection. Each stage comprised a self-complete questionnaire, clinic assessment and Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI).  In Stage 2 (2004-2006), Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans were undertaken on those aged 50 years and over (n=1066), which enabled the calculation of fat mass index and fat free mass index. Additional data included demographics and body mass index (BMI). As part of the telephone interview, participants were asked if they had ever had back, hip, knee, shoulder and hand pain and/or stiffness on most days for at least a month and whether they had pain or stiffness in the feet on most days. The association with areas of pain and BMI, fat mass (kg), fat mass index, fat free mass (kg) and fat free mass index were examined using logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among those aged 50 years and over, the prevalence of pain and/or stiffness in the feet was 20.2%, shoulder 27.8%, hip 15.6%, back 40.8%, hand 21.5% and knee 18.0%. The unadjusted and adjusted associations between areas of pain, BMI and body composition measurements are presented in Table 1. There were significant associations for both weightbearing and non-weightbearing joints between BMI and body composition variables even after adjustment for age, sex and the appropriate body composition measure.

Table 1: Unadjusted and adjusted association between areas of musculoskeletal pain, BMI and body composition

 

BMI

Fat mass

Fat mass index

Fat free mass

Fat free mass index

Unadjusted

*denotes significant p<0.05

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Foot

1.07 (1.04-1.11)*

1.04 (1.02-1.05)*

1.10 (1.06-1.14)*

0.99 (0.98-1.00)

1.00 (0.94-1.06)

Shoulder

1.03 (1.00-1.06)*

1.01 (1.00-1.02)

1.03 (1.00-1.07)

1.00 (0.99-1.01)

1.03 (0.97-1.08)

Hip

1.07 (1.03-1.10)*

1.04 (1.02-1.06)*

1.11 (1.07-1.16)*

0.99 (0.97-1.00)

0.98 (0.92-1.05)

Hand

1.06 (1.02-1.09)*

1.03 (1.01-1.04)*

1.09 (1.05-1.14)*

0.98 (0.96-0.99)*

0.97 (0.92-1.03)

Back

1.06 (1.04-1.09)*

1.03 (1.02-1.05)*

1.08 (1.05-1.12)*

1.00 (0.99-1.01)

1.03 (0.98-1.08)

Knee

1.07 (1.04-1.10)*

1.03 (1.02-1.05)*

1.08 (1.04-1.12)*

1.01 (1.00-1.03)

1.07 (1.00-1.14)*

Adjusted for age and sex

*denotes significant p<0.05

BMI

Fat mass

Fat mass index

Fat free mass

Fat free mass index

Foot

1.07 (1.04-1.10)*

1.03 (1.02-1.05)*

1.09 (1.05-1.14)*

1.04 (1.01-1.07)*

1.14 (1.05-1.24)*

Shoulder

1.03 (1.00-1.06)

1.01 (0.99-1.02)

1.02 (0.98-1.06)

1.03 (1.01-1.05)*

1.12 (1.04-1.21)*

Hip

1.07 (1.03-1.10)*

1.04 (1.02-1.06)*

1.11 (1.05-1.16)*

1.03 (1.00-1.06)

1.13 (1.03-1.24)*

Hand

1.06 (1.02-1.09)*

1.02 (1.00-1.04)*

1.07 (1.03-1.12)*

1.01 (0.98-1.03)

1.13 (1.04-1.23)*

Back

1.06 (1.04-1.09)*

1.03 (1.02-1.05)*

1.09 (1.05-1.14)*

1.03 (1.01-1.05)*

1.12 (1.04-1.20)*

Knee

1.07 (1.03-1.10)*

1.03 (1.02-1.05)*

1.09 (1.04-1.14)*

1.05 (1.03-1.08)*

1.18 (1.08-1.29)*

Adjusted for age and sex and relevant body composition measure

*denotes significant p<0.05

BMI

Fat massa

Fat mass indexa

Fat free massb

Fat free mass index

Foot

 

1.03 (1.00-1.05)*

1.08 (1.02-1.13)*

1.02 (0.99-1.05)

1.05 (0.95-1.16)

Shoulder

 

0.99 (0.98-1.01)

0.98 (0.94-1.03)

1.03 (1.01-1.06)*

1.14 (1.04-1.25)*

Hip

 

1.04 (1.02-1.06)*

1.10 (1.04-1.16)*

1.00 (0.96-1.03)

1.01 (0.91-1.14)

Hand

 

1.02 (1.01-1.04)*

1.05 (1.00-1.11)*

0.99 (0.96-1.02)

1.07 (0.97-1.18)

Back

 

1.03 (1.02-1.05)*

1.09 (1.04-1.13)*

1.01 (0.98-1.03)

1.03 (0.95-1.12)

Knee

 

1.02 (1.00-1.04)*

1.06 (1.00-1.12)*

1.04 (1.01-1.07)*

1.11 (1.00-1.23)

aModels with fat mass and fat mass index adjusted for fat free mass and fat free mass index respectively

bModels with fat free mass and fat free mass index adjusted for fat mass and fat mass index respectively

Conclusion: The prevalence of joint pain is high in community dwelling people aged 50 years and over. BMI and body composition measurements are associated with reports of pain, in both weightbearing and non-weightbearing joints.  The association with fat mass and fat mass index in particular may be associated with metabolic effects.  However, body composition does need to be considered when treating those with musculoskeletal pain.

1 Brady SRE et al. Body composition is associated with multisite lower body musculoskeletal pain in a community-based study. Journal of Pain. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.pain.2015.04.006


Disclosure: T. K. Gill, None; T. P. Walsh, None; E. M. Shanahan, None; C. Hill, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gill TK, Walsh TP, Shanahan EM, Hill C. Association Between Musculoskeletal Pain, Fat Mass and Fat Free Mass: Results from a Population-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-musculoskeletal-pain-fat-mass-and-fat-free-mass-results-from-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-musculoskeletal-pain-fat-mass-and-fat-free-mass-results-from-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology