ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2114

Higher Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates in Black Americans: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Anne R. Bass1, Kelly McHugh1, Kara Fields2,3, Rie Smethurst4, Michael Parks5 and Susan M. Goodman1, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Medicine/Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Education - Academic Training, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 5Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Arthroplasty, complications, Knee, outcomes and race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Utilization
of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is lower among blacks than whites in the
United States (U.S.), which may be due to blacks’ perception of increased TKA
risk.   Approximately 4% of TKA require revision within five years. The purpose
of this study was to determine whether U.S. blacks are at higher risk for TKA
revision than U.S. whites.

Methods: A systematic review
of English language articles, published during or after 2000, was performed on
March 31, 2015 using Medline via PubMed, the Cochrane register and EMBASE. In
addition, a hand search of unlisted journals that focus on racial disparities
was performed. Study inclusion criteria were (1) U.S. patient population, (2)
TKA as the primary procedure; (3) follow up period at least 2 years; (4)
reporting of revisions rates; (5) analysis of patient race as an independent
predictor of revision. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full text
articles in a standardized manner. Meta-analysis was used to analyze the risk of
revision TKA in blacks compared to whites.

Results: 4286 studies were
identified and screened by title, 106 by abstract and 24 by full text. Six
studies met the inclusion criteria and were qualitatively reviewed (Table 1).
Only 4 of the 6 studies could be meta-analyzed because of overlapping study
populations in 3 of them. The meta-analysis represented 451,960 TKA patients,
of whom 31,568 (7.0%) underwent revision surgery and 28,772 (6.3%) were black.  The
risk of revision TKA was significantly higher among U.S. blacks than U.S. whites
(HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.20-1.59) (Figure 1). Analysis of the 3 studies with
overlapping study populations demonstrated discordant results as a result of
adjustment versus non-adjustment for insurance status (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Blacks in the U.S. are at higher risk for revision TKA
than whites, which may contribute to a perception of increased TKA risk among
blacks.  Socioeconomic status (as represented by insurance status) also
contributes to revision risk and is an important confounder in analyses of
race.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: A. R. Bass, None; K. McHugh, None; K. Fields, None; R. Smethurst, None; M. Parks, Zimmer, Inc, 5,Orthopeadic Research and Education Foundation, 6,American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Learning Center, 6,New York State Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 6; S. M. Goodman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bass AR, McHugh K, Fields K, Smethurst R, Parks M, Goodman SM. Higher Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates in Black Americans: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/higher-total-knee-arthroplasty-revision-rates-in-black-americans-a-systematic-literature-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/higher-total-knee-arthroplasty-revision-rates-in-black-americans-a-systematic-literature-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology