ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2051

Risk for Lower Intestinal Perforations in RA Patients Treated with Tocilizumab in Comparison to Treatment with TNF Inhibitors, Rituximab, Abatacept or Conventional Synthetic Dmards

Anja Strangfeld1, Adrian Richter2, Peter Herzer3, Karin Rockwitz4, Winfried Demary5, Martin Aringer6, Angela Zink7 and Joachim Listing8, 1Epidemiology, German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany, 2German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany, 3Rheumatologist, Scientific Advisory Board, München, Germany, 4Rheumatologic Practice, Goslar, Germany, 5Rheumatologist, Hildesheim, Germany, 6Rheumatology, Medicine III, University Clinical Center, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 7Epidemiologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany, 8Epidemiology, DRFZ, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologic agents, DMARDs, Safety issues and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Infection, Malignancy and Other Comorbidites in RA

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:
Interleukin-6 has a direct protective effect on intestinal cells. Although
several cases of lower intestinal perforations (LIP) were reported in clinical
trials of tocilizumab (TCZ), the incidence in daily care remains unclear. The
event rate is low in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and several
factors may contribute to the risk for LIP. We aimed to examine the incidence
of LIP in RA patients treated with biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs
(bDMARDs, csDMARDs).

Methods: We
used data from the German biologics register RABBIT with 13,600 RA patients
included since 2001 at start of a csDMARD or bDMARD after at least one csDMARD
failure. All serious gastrointestinal adverse events reported until 30th
April 2015 which were possibly associated with perforations (including
haemorrhages) were filtered (n=137) and validated with medical records or
specific queries, blinded for treatment exposure. Only events with a definite (non-traumatic
and non-iatrogenic) perforation of the lower intestinal tract were selected for
the analysis. Treatment exposure was defined as treatment given in the last 3-months
before the event. Due to low numbers of events multi-variable adjustment was
not applied.

Results: In
total, 35 LIPs (colon/sigma: 30, appendix:
4, terminal ileum: 1) were observed in 48,102 patient years (PY) – 16 of the
patients died. In total, 27 of 35 patients with LIP had concomitant GCs, with a
daily dose of  ≥7,5mg in 12 patients. In the univariate analysis, current
use of glucocorticoids (GC) and age were significantly associated with a higher
risk of LIP (hazard ratio (HR) 1.25 per 5mg increase in GC dose [95%CI=1.2, 1.4],
and HR 1.5 [1.3, 1.9] per 5 years increase in age).

11 LIP were
observed in 1,765 patients treated with TCZ, corresponding to a five times
higher incidence rate than in patients receiving csDMARDs only  (IRR 5.1 (2.2,
11.8)). The incidence rate was also higher compared to patients treated with other
bDMARDs (figure). The increased risk could not be explained by GC use and age
of the TCZ treated patients which were similar to patients treated with other bDMARDs.
 

None of the
patients with LIP had a history of diverticulitis known to the treating
rheumatologist. Most often, diverticulitis was diagnosed simultaneously with LIP.  
   

The incidence rates in anti-TNF treated patients in RABBIT were
similar to those reported by others1.

 

Conclusion: This 1st  comparison of all bDMARDs
available for the treatment of RA showed a significant risk of LIPs in patients
treated with TCZ and confirms the signal detected in clinical trials. In none of
the patients with LIP a history of  diverticulitis was known, which may
therefore not constitute sufficient information to support treatment decisions.
To avoid additive effects on the risk of LIP concomitant GCs, should be tapered
with initiation of TCZ treatment.

(1)    Myasoedova E, et al. (2012). J Rheumatol 39(7):1355-1362.

 


Disclosure: A. Strangfeld, AbbVie, Celltrion, Hospira, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 2,BMS, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, 9; A. Richter, None; P. Herzer, Abbvie, 9,Pfizer Inc, 9; K. Rockwitz, None; W. Demary, None; M. Aringer, Pfizer Inc, 9; A. Zink, AbbVie, Celltrion, Hospira, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 2,BMS, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, UCB., 9; J. Listing, AbbVie, Celltrion, Hospira, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 2,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strangfeld A, Richter A, Herzer P, Rockwitz K, Demary W, Aringer M, Zink A, Listing J. Risk for Lower Intestinal Perforations in RA Patients Treated with Tocilizumab in Comparison to Treatment with TNF Inhibitors, Rituximab, Abatacept or Conventional Synthetic Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-for-lower-intestinal-perforations-in-ra-patients-treated-with-tocilizumab-in-comparison-to-treatment-with-tnf-inhibitors-rituximab-abatacept-or-conventional-synthetic-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-for-lower-intestinal-perforations-in-ra-patients-treated-with-tocilizumab-in-comparison-to-treatment-with-tnf-inhibitors-rituximab-abatacept-or-conventional-synthetic-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology