ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1309

Defining an Acceptable Level of MRI Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Joshua Baker1, Mikkel Østergaard2, Daniel Baker3, Paul Emery4 and Philip G. Conaghan5, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark, 3Immunology, Centocor Inc., Malvern, PA, 4Division of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5University of Leeds & NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Clinical research, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II: X-ray, MRI, PET and CT

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
Imaging-detected inflammation persists in many rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients
despite therapy. We used data from two clinical trials of golimumab to
determine thresholds for RA magnetic resonance imaging scores (RAMRIS) for synovitis
and osteitis associated with a low risk of radiographic and MRI progression in
structural damage.

Methods: MRI of the dominant hand was performed and RAMRIS scores were determined
at weeks 0, 24, and 52. X-rays were also performed and van der Heijde-Sharp
scores (vdHS) determined. .In a development cohort (GO-BEFORE) the changes in
MRI erosion score and vdHS score were determined over the 24-week to 52-week
interval. MRI erosion and vdHS progression were defined as a change of >0.5.
We aimed to identify 24-week thresholds for synovitis (total possible score 21)
and osteitis (possible score 230) that provided approximately 90% sensitivity
for MRI erosion progression over the 24 to 52 week interval. Rates of
progression were illustrated over the range of synovitis, osteitis, and a
combination (total inflammation score) at the beginning of the interval. The
performance of the cutoffs was then tested in a validation cohort (GO-FORWARD).

Results: In
the development cohort, subjects who reached a synovitis or osteitis score
<=5 by 24 weeks had a low probability of progression on MRI and X-ray
between 24 and 52 weeks (8% and 9%, respectively). The coefficient for osteitis
was stronger than that of synovitis in multivariable models predicting X-ray
and MRI progression. Therefore, when these scores were combined into a single
inflammation score, the score was weighted on osteitis (x2). In the validation
cohort, subjects who reached an inflammation score of <=10 by 24 weeks had a
low predicted probability of progression from 24 to 52 weeks (7%). In the
validation cohort, there was a low rate of MRI progression between 24 and 52
weeks among those with low synovitis, osteitis, and inflammation scores (Table)
independent of 24-week DAS28 or C-reactive protein.  A lower risk of x-ray
progression was observed between 0 and 52 weeks among 34% of subjects with a
low inflammation score at baseline as well as among the 47% and 49% of subjects
who reached a low inflammation score by weeks 12 or 24, respectively.

Conclusion:
Patients that reach low
levels of MRI inflammation by 3 or 6 months are substantially less likely to
have structural damage progression independent of DAS28 response. A low score
by 6 months is predictive of a low risk of radiographic progression over 52
weeks, suggesting that these outcomes might potentially be used as early
dichotomous endpoints in clinical studies. 

 


Disclosure: J. Baker, None; M. Østergaard, None; D. Baker, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; P. Emery, Pfizer Inc, MSD, AbbVie, BMS, UCB, Roche, Novartis, Samsung, Eli Lilly and Company, takeda, 5; P. G. Conaghan, Abbvie, BMS, Novartis Non-remunerative, 5,Abbvie, BMS, Janssen, Roche, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baker J, Østergaard M, Baker D, Emery P, Conaghan PG. Defining an Acceptable Level of MRI Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/defining-an-acceptable-level-of-mri-inflammation-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/defining-an-acceptable-level-of-mri-inflammation-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology