ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 686

Does an Educational Leaflet Improve Attendance for Screening for Psoriatic Arthritis?

Laura C Coates, Laura J Savage, Anna R. Moverley and Philip S. Helliwell, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Education, patient, psoriatic arthritis and questionnaires

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Clinical Aspects and Assessments

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: There is a need for screening to
identify patients with psoriasis who have PsA.  We developed an educational
leaflet about the risk of PsA to improve screening attendance.  Our aim was to investigate
the prevalence of PsA in primary care and whether an educational leaflet can
improve attendance.

Methods: Patients with psoriasis were identified from
5 GP surgeries in Yorkshire and a random sample were invited to participate. 
Patients had to be ≥18 years old, have a coded diagnosis of psoriasis and
no diagnosis of PsA, RA or AS.  At each site, patients were randomised 1:1 to
receive study information alone or with the educational leaflet.  Consenting
patients were then assessed by a dermatologist and rheumatologist.  Diagnosis
of PsA was made by the assessing rheumatologist. To compare the response rate,
we assumed a difference of 20% (50% without leaflet, 70% with leaflet).  With
an alpha=0.05 and beta 0.9, using a two sided test a minimum sample size of 248
was required.  191 attendees were required for assessment of screening
questionnaires.

Results: A total of 932 packs were sent out to
recruit 191 (20.5%) participants attending.  Of these, 169 (88.5%) had current
or previous psoriasis.  Using physician diagnosis 17 (10.1%) were found to have
previously undiagnosed PsA, 90 (53.3%) were found to have another musculoskeletal
complaint and 62 (36.7%) had no musculoskeletal problems.  Using data from the
practices and correcting for misdiagnosis of psoriasis, the estimated
prevalence of PsA was 18.1%.

Overall the response rate was lower than predicted and was not
significantly higher when patients received the educational leaflet (22.8% vs
18.3%, p=0.08).  Response rates varied by practice (14.7 to 30.6%).  Socioeconomic
data of the registered patients at each practice provided national statistics
on deprivation with each practice given a decile score.  In our study, one
practice had a deprivation score of 3 (third most deprived), one had a score of
7 and the rest had a score of 10 (least deprived decile).  Analysing the impact
of the leaflet on response rates by deprivation showed that there was a
significant increase in response with the leaflet for deprivation decile of 3 (see
table, p<0.001) but no significant differences in the other practices.

Conclusion: The total prevalence of PsA within
patients with psoriasis in primary care is estimated at 18.1%, and from a
sample of 191, 10.1% are diagnosed with new PsA at screening.  An educational
leaflet about PsA did not improve attendance for screening overall, but did
significantly improve attendance in practices with higher levels of
socioeconomic deprivation.

 

Deprivation Index

Information given

No of packs sent

Response rate (%)

Pearson Chi Squared

P value

3

Leaflet

46

30.4

13.21

<0.001

 

No leaflet

54

3.7

7

Leaflet

75

18.7

1.92

0.166

 

No leaflet

75

10.7

10

Leaflet

340

22.6

0.18

0.894

 

No leaflet

342

22.2

 


Disclosure: L. C. Coates, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 2,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 8; L. J. Savage, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 8; A. R. Moverley, None; P. S. Helliwell, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 8,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coates LC, Savage LJ, Moverley AR, Helliwell PS. Does an Educational Leaflet Improve Attendance for Screening for Psoriatic Arthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-an-educational-leaflet-improve-attendance-for-screening-for-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/does-an-educational-leaflet-improve-attendance-for-screening-for-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology