ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1431

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Contributes to Clinical Assessments in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Maasa Hama1, Mitsuhiro Takeno1, Atsushi Ihata1, Daiga Kishimoto1, Reikou Watanabe1, Takeaki Uehara2, Ryusuke Yoshimi1, Yukiko Asami1, Atsuhisa Ueda1 and Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo1, 1Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan, 2Department of Rheumatology, Chigasaki Municipal Hospital, Chigasaki, Japan

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Neuroimaging, neuropsychiatric disorders and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Because the clinical manifestations of NPSLE are diverse, multifaceted approaches are necessary to evaluate the disease activity and therapeutic responses. We investigated contribution of various CNS examinations to clinical assessment in each subtype of NPSLE.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical features and the findings of CSF, EEG, CNS imaging modalities including MRI and SPECT in 41 patients (6 male, 35 female) who met ACR 1997 SLE classification criteria with neuropsychiatric symptoms from 2000 to 2011. The patients were categorized into 3 groups according to ACR-defined NPSLE syndromes at 1999; Patients with neurological symptoms (Group N), those with psychiatric symptoms (Group P), and those with the both (Group N+P).

Results: Median age at onset of SLE was 25 years old (range 5-63). About a half of the patients developed neuropsychiatric symptoms within a year from SLE onset. Based on the clinical symptoms such as cognitive dysfunction (37%), acute confusional state (32%), seizure (29%), headache (22%), aseptic meningitis (20%), and cerebrovascular disease (15%), the patients were classified into Group N (16 patients, 39%), Group P (13 patients, 32%), and Group N+P (12 patients, 29%). Pleocytosis and increased protein in CSF were the most frequently found in Group N, whereas increased protein with high IgG index was also observed in a part of patients in Group P. EEG abnormality, especially emergence of slow waves, was more prevalent in group P and N+P than group N. MRI showed any abnormalities in 85 %. Diffuse white matter (WM) high intensity signals in Group N, and cerebral parenchymal atrophy and focal WM high intensity signals in group P and N+P were common. SPECT revealed the hypoperfusion, particularly in the frontal and parietal lobes in all patients but one, even in those having normal MRI. Most patients received potent immunosuppressive therapies including steroid pulse and IVCY, leading to clinical improvement in 69% of Group N but 37.5% of Group P and N+P, irrespective of pre-therapeutic clinical parameters. In 19 patients having follow-up examinations of SPECT, brain perfusion was restored with clinical amelioration responding the therapy in 4 out of 5 patients of Group N. In contrast, hypoperfusion was unchanged or decreased in about 75%, 50% of Group P, N+P, respectively. In the two groups, there was a discrepancy between SPECT findings and clinical course in 5 of 14 patients.

Conclusion: Cerebral hypoperfusion in SPECT was associated with NP lesions in SLE and the findings were closely correlated with disease activity especially in neurological deficits rather than psychiatric symptoms.


Disclosure:

M. Hama,
None;

M. Takeno,
None;

A. Ihata,
None;

D. Kishimoto,
None;

R. Watanabe,
None;

T. Uehara,
None;

R. Yoshimi,
None;

Y. Asami,
None;

A. Ueda,
None;

Y. Ishigatsubo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/single-photon-emission-computed-tomography-contributes-to-clinical-assessments-in-neuropsychiatric-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology