ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 150

A Preliminary Consensus on Core Outcome Domains for Total Joint Replacement Clinical Trials: An Omeract-Based Study

Jasvinder A. Singh1 and Michael Dohm2, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Orthopaedic Surgery, Univ of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: arthroplasty and outcomes, Hip, Knee

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Health Services Research Poster I: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment Strategies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Trials (OMERACT) has developed a framework based on the WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) conceptual model.  It proposes four core areas to assess the impact of disease, namely Death, Life Impact, Resource Use/Economic Impact and Pathophysiological Manifestations and within each area to select one or more domains applicable to every condition of interest.  The objective of this study was to perform a survey of important stakeholders to develop preliminary recommendations for core domains to be reported in TJR clinical trials. 

Methods:

We surveyed two groups of experts, who rated potential core domains (mapped to Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Trials (OMERACT) filter 2.0 framework) for their relevance to TJR clinical trials during the 2014 American Academy of Orthopaedic surgeons [AAOS] and the 2014 OMERACT meetings. Ratings were on a 1 to 9 scale, 1-3 indicating domain of limited importance, 4-6 being important, but not critical domain, and 7-9 being critical domain.

Results:

 17 stakeholders at the AAOS and 19 stakeholders at OMERACT meeting completed the survey. At the two meetings, 86% and 36% were arthroplasty researcher/surgeons, 0% and 10% were patients and 58% and 31% were 55 years and older, respectively.  The following domains were rated as candidates for critical core domains by both groups, with a median score of 7 and above (median score from AAOS vs. OMERACT): Joint pain (9 vs. 9), functional ability (8 vs. 9), joint-specific quality of life (8 vs. 7), patient satisfaction (7 vs. 8), revision surgery (8 vs. 7), adverse events (9 vs. 8), death (9 vs. 7.5), serious adverse events (8.5 vs. 8), reoperation (8 vs. 8), and cost (7 vs. 7). 

 Table 1.  Preliminary Core Areas/Domains for TJR Clinical Trials

AAOS

Median [IQR]

OMERACT

Median [IQR]

Both combined

Median [IQR]

Ratings for the Main Domains to be reported in every TJR clinical trial

 

Joint Pain

9 [8, 9]

9 [9, 9]

9 [8, 9]

Function or functional ability

(ability to function in society, work; work productivity, employability; disability; work disability)

8 [8, 9]

9 [8, 9]

9 [7, 9]

Generic Quality of life

(including fatigue, sleep, mood, stress, anxiety, depression)

6 [4, 9]

7 [5.75, 8.25]

7 [5, 8]

Joint-specific Quality of life

8 [7, 9]

7 [5, 7.25]

7 [6, 8]

Patient Satisfaction

(satisfaction with the outcome, satisfaction with the procedure)

7 [5, 8]

8 [7, 9]

7.5 [5.75, 9]

Patient expectation of surgical outcome

5 [4, 8]

5 [4, 7]

5 [4, 7]

Revision surgery

8 [6, 9]

7 [7, 9]

8 [6, 9]

Adverse events

9 [8, 9]

8 [7, 9]

8 [7, 9]

Death

9 [8, 9]

7.5 [5, 9]

8 [6, 9]

Ratings for Additional domains for consideration

 

Serious Adverse events

8.5 [7, 9]

8 [8, 9]

8 [7, 9]

Cardiac Adverse events

(e.g. Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, worsening of congestive heart failure)

7.5 [5.75, 8]

6 [5.5, 7.5]

6 [6, 8]

Pulmonary Adverse events

(e.g. Pneumonia, Pulmonary Embolism)

7 [5.75, 8]

6 [5.5, 7]

7 [6, 8]

Reoperation

8 [5.5, 9]

8 [7, 8]

8 [6.25, 8]

Cost

7 [4, 8]

7 [6, 7]

7 [6, 8]

Health care utilization

(e.g. length of stay)

5 [3, 7.25]

7 [6, 7]

6 [5, 7]

Readmission

(e.g. 90-day readmission)

6.5 [5, 8.75]

7 [6, 7]

7 [6, 9]

 

 

 

 

Conclusion:

This study lays the foundation for future work by identifying preliminary core domain set for TJR clinical trials. This core domain set will be further vetted with multi-stakeholder input. It will be used for the development of TJR clinical trial core measurement set.


Disclosure: J. A. Singh, Takeda, Savient, 2,Takeda, Savient, merz, Regeneron, Allergan, Crealta, Bioiberica, 5; M. Dohm, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh JA, Dohm M. A Preliminary Consensus on Core Outcome Domains for Total Joint Replacement Clinical Trials: An Omeract-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-preliminary-consensus-on-core-outcome-domains-for-total-joint-replacement-clinical-trials-an-omeract-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-preliminary-consensus-on-core-outcome-domains-for-total-joint-replacement-clinical-trials-an-omeract-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology