ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2889

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for the Treatment of Raynaud’s and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Edward S Harris1, Herbert J Meiselman2, Patrick M Moriarty3 and Allan Metzger4, 1Scleroderma Education Project Ltd, Madison, WI, 2Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 3Clinical Pharmacology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 4RDL Reference Laboratory Inc, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Raynaud's phenomenon, systemic sclerosis and ulcers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is an early marker of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and digital ulcers (DU) are a serious complication of vascular dysfunction, occurring in about 50% of SSc patients.  DU are painful, difficult to heal, and in some cases progress to gangrene and autoamputation. Current treatments for RP and DU focus on improving distal blood flow using vasodilators, vasoconstrictor antagonists, or drugs which reduce vasospasm.  Nevertheless, many patients continue to develop DU over time, suggesting the need for alternative treatment options.

Methods: We reviewed all publications between 1978 and 2016 on the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to treat patients with SSc. Out of the 40 papers reviewed, 13 reported effects on RP and DU.  Four studies were confounded by simultaneous use of drug therapies and were excluded from the analysis shown in the table.

Results: A commonly reported finding was that a single course of a small number of weekly TPE treatments (typically four) had significant effects on both RP and DU as well as blood flow, microvessel patency, and blood rheology.  In many patients, RP disappeared or was significantly improved, and even long-standing digital ulcers began to heal. Several studies documented abnormal blood rheology pre-treatment (elevated whole blood viscosity (WBV) and RBC aggregation) that was significantly reduced after four weekly TPE treatments.  The improvements in symptoms and blood rheology were surprisingly long lasting: at least six months and in one study no reoccurrence of DU was observed at three-year follow-up.

Conclusion: In patients diagnosed with SSc, a limited course of TPE treatments appears to lead to significant improvements in RP and DU symptoms as well as objective improvements in blood flow, microvessel patency, and blood rheology that persist for several months.  Since TPE treatments have no known direct effects on blood vessels, these results suggest that TPE may have an entirely different mechanism of action.  Volkov (2006) noted that WBV is highest in patients with active DU, raising the possibility that the long-lasting normalization of whole blood viscosity and significant reduction of RBC aggregation may directly lead to enhanced microvascular blood flow and thus to improved microvessel patency and SSc symptoms.  We recommend that a randomized, double blind, placebo-control study of TPE that includes measurements of blood rheology be conducted to better understand these effects.  

Study Type N TPE Protocol Follow-Up Summary / Notes
Cotton 1978 PS 12 Varied Not reported Letter. Improved microvessel patency in 10/12 Pts.  Gangrene reversed in 1 Pt. after 6 TPE.
Talpos 1978 PS 5 1 TPE/week for 5 weeks 6 months post TPE 4/5 patients with DU before TPE.  All DU but 1 healed after TPE.  Significant improvement in RP and DU post TPE.  Blood viscosity sig improved in 3/3 Pts.
Dodds 1979 PS 8 1 TPE/week for 4 weeks 6 weeks post TPE DU healed in 3/3 Pts.  Microvessel patency improved in 6/6 Pts.
O’Reilly 1979 RCT 27 (9 in TPE group) 1 TPE/week for 4 weeks 6 weeks, 6 months post TPE Microvessel patency significantly improved in TPE group only at 6 week and 6 month follow-up. DU healed after TPE in 3/3 Pts and remained healed at 6 month F/U.
Zahavi 1980 CT 37 (9 Pts. with severe SSc in TPE group) 1 TPE/week for 4 weeks 3 months post TPE At F/U, microvessel patency improved in 7/8 Pts. and DU healed in 3/3 Pts.
McCune 1983 PS 6 1 TPE or ÒshamÓ TPE/week  for 4 weeks 3 months, 6 months post TPE Complicated design with mixed TPE and autologous ÒshamÓ TPE.  5/6 maintained improvements in RP and DU at 3 month and 6 month F/U.  Some objective measures improved with sham TPE as well as standard TPE.
Von Rhede van der Kloot 1985 PS 14 (7 primary RP, 7 secondary RP) 1 TPE/week for 4 weeks Post TPE only RP disappeared or improved in 6/7 Pts. in secondary RP group and 2/7 in primary RP group, DU improved in 3/3 Pts. in secondary RP group.
Ferri 1987 PS 6 (severe SSc) 3 TPE/week for 6 to 8 weeks, then tapering down.  Total duration 6 to 14 weeks. Post TPE only 5 Pts. completed protocol.  DU healed or significantly improved in 5/5 Pts. at end of TPE.
Jacobs 1991 PS 18 1 TPE/week  for 4 weeks Three, nine, 24, 36 months post TPE Post TPE, all Pts. had either complete elimination of TP or significant reduction.  Any DU healed.  No reoccurrence of DU at 3-year F/U.  In 14 Pts. RP returned after 6 to 9 months post-TPE.  In 4 Pts, no RP at 3-year F/U.  RBC aggregation was significantly less (p<.001) post TPE and gradually returned to pre-TPE levels after 9 months. 
PS: Pilot Study   RCT: Randomized Controlled Trial     CT: Controlled Trial

 


Disclosure: E. S. Harris, None; H. J. Meiselman, None; P. M. Moriarty, None; A. Metzger, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Harris ES, Meiselman HJ, Moriarty PM, Metzger A. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for the Treatment of Raynaud’s and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapeutic-plasma-exchange-for-the-treatment-of-raynauds-and-digital-ulcers-in-systemic-sclerosis-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapeutic-plasma-exchange-for-the-treatment-of-raynauds-and-digital-ulcers-in-systemic-sclerosis-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology