ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1498

Engaging Clinic Staff in Work System Redesign to Adapt a Hypertension Protocol for Rheumatology

Edmond Ramly1, Diane Lauver2 and Christie M. Bartels3, 1Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering, Madison, WI, 2University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, 3Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin (UW) School of Medicine and Public Health (SMPH), Madison, WI

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Healthcare system, hypertension, nursing roles and prevention

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session (ARHP): Clinical Practice/Patient Care

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Despite routine blood pressure (BP) measurement by
clinic staff, we reported that rheumatologists discussed elevated BPs in
<1/3 of visits leading to missed opportunities for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Staff-driven hypertension protocols in primary care reduce such variation by
empowering clinic staff. Our objective was to engage clinic staff in work
system redesign to develop and implement a blood pressure protocol adapted to
specialty care. We report results of this process under the five work system
domains: people, tools, organization, environment, and tasks.

Methods: Our multidisciplinary team engaged clinic
staff (medical assistants (MA), nurses (RN), and schedulers) in work system redesign.
Three discipline-specific one hour focus groups appraised pre-visit rooming and
check-out workflows, our proposed protocol, and electronic health record (EHR)
tools. Staff participated in a 45 min group session on BP, and one-on-one 15
min EHR training sessions. We audited fidelity through EHR data and provided
monthly individual audit feedback. These brief sessions focused on goal-setting
and staff-driven problem-solving. Three later focus groups offered us
evaluative feedback and suggestions for improvements. We also administered a
retrospective anonymous 15 item staff questionnaire after pilot testing.

Results: Over 90% (9 MAs, 5 RNs, 4 schedulers) of
staff participated in focus groups. Content analysis of the focus groups
informed the development and implementation of work system redesign
interventions (Table 1). The work system redesign included training (people),
protocol and workflows adapted to specialty care (organization, tasks), a
customized EHR alert for elevated BP and EHR follow-up order set (technology),
and supportive physical cues like a desktop patient brochure linking
rheumatologic conditions and heart risk (environment). Four monthly audit
feedback sessions with 10 regular MAs or RNs identified barriers and solutions.
All staff met progressively higher goals and achievement.  In evaluative
focus groups staff voiced satisfaction and suggested pragmatic changes
including BP re-measurement red cue cards and EHR alert revisions.
Questionnaires showed improved BP self-efficacy post intervention.

Conclusion: We engaged rheumatology clinic staff in
participatory work system redesign to improve follow up for patients with
elevated blood pressure. The collaborative redesign process resulted in
successful modification and implementation of a blood pressure protocol for
specialty care. Results suggest sound intervention feasibility including
improved staff self-efficacy and demonstrate good intervention fidelity
including improved BP re-measurement and follow up orders over time.

 

 

 


Disclosure: E. Ramly, Pfizer Inc, 2; D. Lauver, Pfizer Inc, 2; C. M. Bartels, Pfizer Inc, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ramly E, Lauver D, Bartels CM. Engaging Clinic Staff in Work System Redesign to Adapt a Hypertension Protocol for Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/engaging-clinic-staff-in-work-system-redesign-to-adapt-a-hypertension-protocol-for-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/engaging-clinic-staff-in-work-system-redesign-to-adapt-a-hypertension-protocol-for-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology