Abstract Number: 2910 • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Development of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Outcome Measure to Enable Comparisons of Patient Experiences across Treatment Arms in Randomized Clinical Trials
Background/Purpose: Randomized controlled trials currently report benefits and adverse events (AEs) separately, and therefore do not permit comparisons of patients’ overall experiences on one treatment…Abstract Number: 1796 • 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Benefits and Sustainability of a Learning Collaborative for Implementation of Treat to Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of Phase II of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Background/Purpose: Treat to target (TTT) is a recommended strategy in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its uptake in routine rheumatologic care in…Abstract Number: 2788 • 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
The Risk of Major Toxicity with Aspirin for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using Nsaids: A Secondary Cohort Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background/Purpose: There are relatively clear guidelines for the use of low dose aspirin in the general population for primary cardiovascular (CV) prevention, but the risk-benefit…Abstract Number: 350 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Change in Bone Mineral Density with High-Dose Prednisone in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Background/Purpose: Recently, we showed that treatment with COBRA-light therapy including prednisone with initially 30 mg/day, was as effective as the original COBRA scheme, with initially…Abstract Number: 2637 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Clinical Trials Aiming to Prevent the Development of Rheumatoid Arthritis Cannot Detect Prevention without Adequate Risk Stratification; A Trial Performed in UA-Patients As Example
Background/Purpose: Prevention of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the aim of several clinical trials performed in undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Overall these trials had negative results. As…Abstract Number: 3214 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Implementation of Treat to Target in Rheumatoid Arthritis through a Learning Collaborative
Background/Purpose: Treat to target (TTT) is a recommended strategy in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but various studies suggest that its uptake in routine…Abstract Number: 1227 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Discrepancies Between Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Background/Purpose: Selective outcome reporting may bias treatment effect estimates of clinical trials. Registration of clinical trials was established to improve transparency in their conduct and…Abstract Number: 2167 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Application of Combined Reporting of Benefit and Harm (OMERACT 3×3 methodology) to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies Trial
Background/Purpose: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Initiative has suggested an analysis of the occurrence of benefit and harm in trials simultaneously, at the individual…Abstract Number: 3110 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
In the Multicenter Randomized Controlled Rotation or Change Trial, a Non-TNF Targeted Therapy Has a Higher Efficacy Than a Second Anti-TNF at 3, 6 and 12 Months
Background/Purpose: As many as one third of patients show insufficient response to their first TNF inhibitor (TNF-insufficient response, TNF-IR). The lack of efficacy of one…Abstract Number: 2781 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Etanercept Vs. Sulfasalazine and Hydroxychloroquine to Methotrexate Therapy: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
Background/Purpose: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of etanercept plus methotrexate versus a triple regimen of disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine) over 24…Abstract Number: 2373 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Compliance in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies Trial: Triple Vs Etanercept
Background/Purpose In the 48-week, double-blinded, noninferiority RACAT trial, 353 methotrexate suboptimal responders were randomized to two treatment strategies, either the addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine…Abstract Number: 1523 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Follow-up Data on the Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies Trial: Observational Cohort
Background/Purpose In this 48-week, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial, 353 methotrexate suboptimal-responders were randomized to two treatment strategies, either the addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine (triple therapy…Abstract Number: 462 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Infections and Gastrointestinal Side Effects in a Comparison of Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapies
Background/Purpose TNF inhibitors and combinations of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are commonly added to treat methotrexate non-responsive rheumatoid arthritis patients. In the 48-week double blind,…Abstract Number: L6 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
A PHASE 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PF-04171327 (1, 5, 10, 15 mg QD) Vs 5 and 10 Mg Prednisone QD or Placebo in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) over 8 Weeks Followed By a 4-Week Taper of Study Drug
Background/Purpose: PF-04171327 is a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR), a selective high-affinity partial agonist of the GR with potent anti-inflammatory activity at exposures…Abstract Number: 1469 • 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Therapeutic Strategy In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Insufficient Response To a 1st Anti-TNF: Results of the Multicenter Randomized Controlled “ROC” Trial
Background/Purpose: TNF inhibitors often represent the 1st biologic prescribed to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Approximately one third of patients fail to respond. However, therapeutic…