Abstracts tagged "qualitative and shared dicision making"

Abstract Number: 2260 • 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Communication Strategies Are Highly Important to Avoid Nocebo Effect When Performing Non-Medical Switch from Originator Product to Biosimilar Product: Danish Results from Applying the Parker Model a Qualitative 3-Step Research Model
Tanja Schjødt Jørgensen¹, Marie Skougaard¹, Hans Christian Asmussen^2,3, Anne Lee⁴, Peter C. Taylor⁵, Henrik Gudbergsen¹ and Lars Erik Kristensen¹, ¹The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen F, Denmark, ²NATiON, Copenhagen, Denmark, ³Communication IKH, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark, ⁴University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, ⁵University of Oxford Botnar Research Centre, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
Background/Purpose: Introducing a non-medical switch from originator to a biosimilar product in the management of chronic arthritis, i.e. switching patients in remission or low disease…
Abstract Number: 2442 • 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Aligning Ethics with Digital Health Technologies and Shared Decision-Making: Interview Accounts of Patients and Clinicians
Anne F. Townsend^1,2,3,4, Paul Adam⁵, Jenny Leese⁶, Linda C. Li^6,7, Michael McDonald², Sheila Kerr⁸, Gordon Whitehead⁸ and Catherine Backman^6,9, ¹Qualitative Research, Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, ²Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ³Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁴University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁵Mary Pack Arthritis Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁶Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, ⁷Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, ⁸Arthritis Patient Advisory Board, Richmond, BC, Canada, ⁹Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Background/Purpose Medical ethics evolves as health care develops. Digital health technologies are transforming health care delivery and patient and clinician relationships. Ethical approaches are shifting…

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].