Abstracts tagged "Private Practice"

Abstract Number: 99 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Academic and Non-Academic Rheumatology: Practice Trends and Common Barriers to Practice from the 2015 ACR/ARHP Workforce Study Survey
Seetha Monrad¹, Daniel Battafarano² and Marcia Ditmyer³, ¹Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, ²Medicine, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, ³Academy for Academic Research, Las Vegas, NV
Background/Purpose: Ten years have elapsed since the last ACR workforce study (WFS), and it is anticipated that rheumatologists will face many challenges to train and…
Abstract Number: 2242 • 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Comparison of Assessment and Management of RA and Other Rheumatic Diseases By Rheumatologists in Private Practices or an Academic Medical Center
Anna Coleman¹, Herbert Lindsley² and Jo Wick³, ¹Rheumatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, ²Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, ³Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Background/Purpose: Since 80% of rheumatologists practice outside the university setting, training projects for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may benefit from an improved understanding of RA management…
Abstract Number: 136 • 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
Physician Patterns of Patient Care in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Are We Ordering Unnecessary Tests?
Aman Kugasia¹, Meenakshi Jolly², Winston Sequeira³, Ailda Nika³, Neha Sehgal⁴ and Mary Dollear⁵, ¹Internal Medicine, John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, ²Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, ³Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, ⁴Indiana University- Bloomington, Valparaiso, IN, ⁵Vice President, Lupus Society of Illinois, Chicago, IL
Background/Purpose: To plan a quality improvement project, we need to understand the practice patterns of physicians. We undertook an online survey of physicians (MDs) (Rheumatologists,…

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].