Abstracts tagged "comparative effectiveness"

Abstract Number: 1160 • ACR Convergence 2020
Treatment Intensity and Impact on Bone Lesion Evolution and Distribution Patterns in Severe Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis
Aleksander Lenert¹, T. Shawn Sato², Sedat G Kandemirli¹, Patrick Ten Eyck¹ and Polly Ferguson³, ¹University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, ²University of Iowa, Iowa City, ³University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
Background/Purpose: To compare bone lesion evolution and bone lesion distribution patterns identified by whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) by treatment intensity in patients with…
Abstract Number: 1241 • ACR Convergence 2020
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Tofacitinib or Biological DMARDs in Real Life Conditions in Two Latin America Countries
Hugo Madariaga¹, Juan Reyes², Magda Gutierrez³, Dario Ponce de Leon⁴, Tatjana Lukic⁵ and Luisa Amador², ¹Centro Medico CEEN, Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru, ²Pfizer, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, ³Pfizer, Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile, ⁴PFIZER, LIMA, Peru, ⁵Pfizer Inc, New York, NY
Background/Purpose: The objective of this study was to describe the efficacy, safety and patient reported outcomes in Latin-American patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) treated with…
Abstract Number: 1346 • ACR Convergence 2020
Predicting Major Treatment Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsin Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Runsheng Wang¹, Abhijit Dasgupta² and Michael Ward³, ¹Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY, ²NIAMS, Bethesda, ³National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Background/Purpose: The treatment response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is heterogeneous. In clinical practice, both patients and…
Abstract Number: 1351 • ACR Convergence 2020
Efficacy of Ixekizumab versus Adalimumab in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Patients with and Without Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results from a Multicentre, Randomised Open-label Study
Lars Erik Kristensen¹, Masato Okada², William Tillett³, Soyi Liu-Leage⁴, Celine El Baou⁵, Andrew Bradley⁵, Gabriella Meszaros⁴ and Kurt de Vlam⁶, ¹The Parker Institute Copenhagen Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark, ²St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, ³Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK, Bath, United Kingdom, ⁴Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, ⁵Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, Indianapolis, IN, ⁶Department of Rheumatology, University of Leuven, Belgium, Leuven, Belgium
Background/Purpose: Ixekizumab (IXE), a selective interleukin-17A antagonist, is approved for the treatment of active PsA, moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO), and radiographic/non-radiographic axial SpA in adults. The…
Abstract Number: 1492 • ACR Convergence 2020
The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Start Time Optimization of Biologic Therapy in Polyarticular JIA Study: Report of Primary Study Outcomes
Yukiko Kimura¹, George Tomlinson², Laura Schanberg³, Mary Ellen Riordan⁴, Anne Dennos⁵, Vincent Del Gaizo⁶, Katherine Murphy⁷, Pamela F. Weiss⁸, Brian Feldman⁹ and Sarah Ringold¹⁰, ¹Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ, ²Department of Medicine, University Hospital Network, Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, ³Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, ⁴Hackensack University Medical Center, Westwood, NJ, ⁵Duke University, Durham, NC, ⁶Childhood Arthritis & Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA), Whitehouse Station, NJ, ⁷Lousiana Department of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, ⁸Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, ⁹The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, ¹⁰Seattle Children's, Seattle, WA
Background/Purpose: There is uncertainty regarding when to start biologic medications for polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (P-JIA). The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) developed…
Abstract Number: 2067 • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
Comparison of Medication New User Definitions in Multi-Specialty EMR Data
Jeffrey Curtis¹, Lang Chen ¹, Narender Annapureddy ², Cassie Clinton ¹, Megan Clowse ³, Millie Long ⁴, W. Benjamin Nowell ⁵, Jim Oates ⁶, Rennie Rhee ⁷, Siddarth Singh ⁸, Fenglong Xie ⁹ and Timothy Beukelman ¹⁰, ¹University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, ²Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, ³Duke University, Durham, ⁴University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, ⁵Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, ⁶Division of Rheumatology & Immunology/Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, ⁷University of Pennsylvania, Division of Rheumatology, Philadelphia, PA, ⁸University California, San Diego, San Diego, ⁹University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, ¹⁰University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Background/Purpose: New user designs are typically preferred in pharmacoepidemiology to avoid bias. The optimal implementation of a new user design in electronic medical record (EMR)…

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].