Abstracts tagged "Clinical Response and registries"

Abstract Number: 837 • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
Does Discordance Between Baseline Patient’s and Evaluator’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity Impact Retention and Remission Rates of a First TNF Inhibitor in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis? Data from the EuroSpA Research Collaboration Network
Brigitte Michelsen¹, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg ², Anne Gitte Loft ³, Tore Kvien ⁴, Adrian Ciurea ⁵, Herman Mann ⁶, Kari K. Eklund ⁷, Ayten Yazici ⁸, Maria José Santos ⁹, Johan Askling ¹⁰, Ziga Rotar ¹¹, Bjorn Gudbjornsson ¹², Manuel Pombo-Suarez ¹³, Catalin Codreanu ¹⁴, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma ¹⁵, Eirik Kristianslund ¹⁶, Michael J. Nissen ¹⁷, Karel Pavelka ⁶, Nina Trokovic ¹⁸, Nevsun Inanc ¹⁹, Elsa Vieira-Sousa ²⁰, Daniela DiGuiseppe ²¹, Matija Tomsic ²², Arni Jon Geirsson ²³, Ruxandra IONESCU ²⁴, Marleen van de Sande ²⁵, Florenzo Iannone ²⁶, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra ²⁷, Gareth Jones ²⁸, Lise Hyldstrup ², Merete Lund Hetland ²⁹ and Mikkel Østergaard ³⁰, ¹Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark/ Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway/ Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Oslo, Norway, ²Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, ³Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Århus, Denmark, ⁴Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Dept. of Rheumatology / University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway, ⁵University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, ⁶Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague 2, Czech Republic, ⁷ROB-FIN registry, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University and University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, ⁸Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey, ⁹Rheumatology department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, ¹⁰Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, ¹¹UMC LJUBLJANA, DPT. OF RHEUMATOLOGY, LJUBLJANA, Slovenia, ¹²Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, ¹³Unit Research, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, ¹⁴Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania., Bucharest, Romania, ¹⁵Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ¹⁶Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Oslo, Norway, ¹⁷University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, ¹⁸Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, ¹⁹Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey, ISTANBUL, Turkey, ²⁰Rheumatology and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Hospital de Santa Maria - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, EPE | Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular - Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal,, Lisbon, Portugal, ²¹Clinical Epidemiology Division, Dept of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet,, Stockholm, Sweden, ²²Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia, ²³Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland, ²⁴SPITALUL CLINIC SFANTA MARIA, Bucharest, ²⁵Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ²⁶Department of Emergency and Transplantation , Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Bari, Bari, Italy., Bari, Italy, ²⁷Research Unit, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain, ²⁸University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, ²⁹DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, ³⁰Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Background/Purpose: Discordance between baseline patient’s and evaluator’s global assessment of disease activity is common.1 However, the impact of such discordance on retention and remission rates…

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].