ACR Convergence 2025

October 24-29, 2025. Chicago, Illinois.

View by Number View by Title View Sessions

Jump to: [View All] • a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

Abstract Number: 0614

Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparing Novel Risk Scores with Carotid Ultrasound
Abstract Number: 1360

Evaluating Causal Effects of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Mendelian Randomisation
Abstract Number: 0530

Evaluating ChatGPT’s Performance in Diagnosing Low Back Pain: A Comparison with Clinicians and Impact of Prompted Specialties
Abstract Number: 0339

Evaluating Discordance between Bilateral Hip Bone Density Measurements in Individuals with Low Bone Mass
Abstract Number: 1617

Evaluating Familiarity and Knowledge Gaps in Polymyalgia Rheumatica Among Public Health Professionals
Abstract Number: 0469

Evaluating Large Language Models for Automated Joint Involvement Analysis in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Abstract Number: 2158

Evaluating Nailfold Capillary Changes as Indicators of Disease Activity in Juvenile Dermatomyositis
Abstract Number: 2003

Evaluating Patient Outcomes Pre and Post Pegloticase Initiation among Uncontrolled Gout Patients: Findings from MORE2 Registry and Medicare Fee-For-Service Claims Data
Abstract Number: 1536

Evaluating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Remission Among Patients Initiating Belimumab in a Real-World Setting in the USA
Abstract Number: 2094

Evaluating the Accuracy of Knee Acoustic Emissions Classification of Varus Thrust
Abstract Number: 0222

Evaluating the Barriers and Facilitators for Collecting and Documenting Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures Using a Rheumatology Provider Survey
Abstract Number: 0531

Evaluating the Diagnostic Utility of 14-3-3 eta Autoantibodies in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Multiplex Assay Approach
Abstract Number: 0556

Evaluating the Efficacy of Sulfasalazine Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract Number: 2603

Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Behavioral Impact of Brief Action Planning (BAP) Coaching for Physical Activity in Adults with Chronic Knee Symptoms: A Qualitative Study
Abstract Number: 1973

Evaluating the Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Integration on Patient Care Outcomes in a Private Rheumatology Clinic

Jump to: [View All] • a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].