2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

November 11-16, 2016. Washington, DC.

View by Number View by Title View Sessions

View by Date

Jump to: [View All] • a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

Abstract Number: 2374

Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Results from an Open-Label Long-Term Follow-up Study
Abstract Number: 2555

Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs As Well As Glucocorticoids: A Systematic Literature Review Informing the 2016 Update of the Eular Recommendations for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Abstract Number: 1635

Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10, Rituximab Biosimilar Candidate, and Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial over 24 Weeks
Abstract Number: 295

Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab for Osteoarthritic Pain in Patients with Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knees or Hips
Abstract Number: 943

Efficacy and Safety of IL-1 Inhibitors in Amyloidosis Associated with Familial Mediterranean Fever Who Underwent Kidney Transplantation
Abstract Number: 625

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Golimumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients 65 Years and Younger and Those Greater Than 65 Years of Age-a Post-Hoc Analysis
Abstract Number: 959

Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 52 Week Results from a Phase 3 Study
Abstract Number: 3222

Efficacy and Safety of Monotherapy with Sirukumab, an Anti–IL-6 Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody, Compared with Adalimumab Monotherapy in Biologic-Naive Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Global, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study
Abstract Number: 733

Efficacy and Safety of Non-Biological Therapy (Non-Biological Drugs and Non-Pharmacological Interventions): A Systematic Literature Review for the 2016 Update of the ASAS/EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis
Abstract Number: 1632

Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Subgroups of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from 2 Phase 3 Studies
Abstract Number: 3221

Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Versus Adalimumab in a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Monotherapy Study in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis with Intolerance or Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
Abstract Number: 3223

Efficacy and Safety of Sirukumab, an Anti–IL-6 Cytokine Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Anti-TNF Therapy: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global, Phase 3 Study
Abstract Number: 602

Efficacy and Safety of Switching Between Certolizumab Pegol and Adalimumab after Primary Anti-TNF Treatment Failure: 2-Year Results from a Randomized, Investigator-Blind, Superiority Head-to-Head Study
Abstract Number: 1591

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Adalimumab to Baricitinib: Phase 3 Data in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Abstract Number: 911

Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: Primary and Secondary Outcomes from a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Jump to: [View All] • a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].