ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2504

Zoster Vaccination in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: An Unmet Care Gap

Alicia Meadows1, Carson Maynard2, Abraham Tacang3, Jason Brown4 and Eric Newman5, 1Rheumatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, 2Internal Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 3Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 4Henry Hood Center for Clinical Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, 5Department of Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Quality and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (shingles) creates a significant burden of healthcare dollars, lost work time, and extended suffering. Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and its treatments increase the risk of shingles 2-3x that of the general population. Despite the higher rate of reactivation and potential cost to healthcare, only about 5% of RA patients receive the zoster vaccine. Currently, the ACR recommends zoster vaccination for patients over age 60 on non-biologic DMARDs or prior to starting biologic therapy.  We aimed to measure the size of our unvaccinated RA population, understand the barriers to vaccination, and develop a plan to increase shingles vaccination.

Methods: We gathered data on our RA patients over age 60 on Disease Modifying Antirheumatic (DMARD) therapy who have ever had shingles or the shingles vaccine prior to 5/29/15 using ICD-9 codes from the EPIC electronic health record. To establish why patients were un-vaccinated we surveyed RA patients at their routine clinic visits over 3 weeks. Patients were permitted to choose more than one answer. Demographics were recorded and survey results were tallied.  System-wide baseline data on shingles diagnosis and vaccination rate was compared to that of our surveyed population.

Results: We surveyed 107 patients. 38 were excluded due to missing demographics, incorrectly completed surveys, not on DMARD, or < 50 years old (36%). 69 patient surveys were included for a total of 75 responses. System-wide, 211 out of 2259 RA patients on DMARD had a history of shingles (9.3%) compared to our survey group, where 5 out of 72 had a history of shingles (6.9%).  System-wide, 184 out of 2259 received the vaccine (8.1%) compared to our survey group where 10 out of 72 (13.8%) received the vaccine. Of the patients who had a shingles diagnosis, 78 (40%) were on a DMARD at the time of diagnosis.  Results of the survey are listed in the table below:

Survey Response

Number of Responses

Percentage

I am currently on a biologic

21

28%

I didn’t know it was recommended or important

13

17.3%

It was never offered to me

13

17.3%

Other

11

14.7%

I’ve had the vaccine

10

13.8%

I had shingles less than 5 years ago

4

5.3%

The vaccine is too expensive

2

2.7%

I’m afraid of side effects

1

1.3%

I’m afraid of shots

0

0%

Total

75

100%

Conclusion: Our health system’s zoster vaccine rate for RA patients was slightly above the national average but still leaves a considerable care gap. Since the largest unvaccinated population was started on a biologic prior to vaccination our biggest opportunity to close this care gap exists before patients start biologic. We believe a process change to integrate the zoster vaccine into pre-biologic initiation workflow would increase the vaccination rate.  This coupled with a real time point-of-service quality measure tool actionable by the nurse and provider would provide timely feedback.


Disclosure: A. Meadows, None; C. Maynard, None; A. Tacang, None; J. Brown, None; E. Newman, xG Health Solutions, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Meadows A, Maynard C, Tacang A, Brown J, Newman E. Zoster Vaccination in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: An Unmet Care Gap [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/zoster-vaccination-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-an-unmet-care-gap/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/zoster-vaccination-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-an-unmet-care-gap/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology