ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2468

Window or No Window? Earlier Is Better When Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis

Sytske Anne Bergstra1, Joy A. van der Pol2, Nagmeh Riyazi3, Yvonne P. Goekoop-Ruiterman3, Arvind Chopra4, José António P. da Silva5, Pit J.S.M. Kerstens6, Willem F. Lems7, S. Tsonaka8, Tom W.J. Huizinga1 and Cornelia F. Allaart1, 1Department of Rheumatology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3HAGA Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands, 4Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Pune, India, 5Department of rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (SRHUC), Coimbra, Portugal, 6Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center | Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Department of Rheumatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III: Complications of Therapy, Outcomes, and Measures

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Previous reports on a window of opportunity (WOO) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be related to the use of slow acting csDMARDs. We investigated whether onset of action of therapy might influence whether there is a WOO or whether ‘earlier is better’. Therefore we aimed to investigate the association between symptom duration at treatment onset and the achievement of sustained drug free remission (sDFR) in early RA patients initiating therapy including fast acting prednisone or infliximab, compared to patients initiating csDMARD monotherapy.
Methods: We analysed the shape (non-linear or linear) of the association between symptom duration and achievement of sDFR (DAS<1.6 and no DMARDs for ≥1 year) in 3 cohorts: BeSt, IMPROVED and METEOR. Patients had arthritis symptoms <2 years. In BeSt, RA-patients (1987 criteria) were randomised to 4 targeted treatment strategies aimed at DAS≤2.4: arm 1 and 2 initiated csDMARD monotherapy, arm 3 csDMARDs and tapered high dose prednisone and arm 4 csDMARD and infliximab. In IMPROVED RA patients (2010 criteria) were treated with csDMARD and tapered high dose prednisone. Subsequent treatment adjustments aimed at DFR. METEOR is an international observational cohort including daily practice data from RA patients with a diagnosis and treatment according to the rheumatologist. We selected patients who initiated csDMARD monotherapy or a combination of csDMARD with prednisone or anti-TNF and at least 1.5 year follow-up.
We performed Cox regression with as outcome sDFR and as predictor symptom duration and used likelihood ratio tests to compare the fit of a linear model and a model with inclusion of natural cubic spline functions (resulting in a hyperbola).
Results:
In BeSt (n=469), IMPROVED (n=421) and METEOR (n=1268) 54, 110 and 10 patients who initiated fast acting combination therapy, and 53 in BeSt and 15 in METEOR who initiated csDMARD monotherapy achieved sDFR. A non-linear model did not show a better fit for the data than a linear model (table 1). Thus, we did not find a curved relationship between time of treatment initiation and achieving sDFR. The best fit models indicate that the earlier treatment is started, the higher the likelihood of achieving sDFR (figure 1).
Conclusion:
Our data suggest that there is no evidence for a WOO in early RA in 3 cohorts. This  was not related to use of fast acting combination therapy instead of slow acting monotherapy nor was it dependent on strict treat-to-target in clinical trials. Instead, our data reaffirm that earlier is better when treating RA.


Disclosure: S. A. Bergstra, None; J. A. van der Pol, None; N. Riyazi, None; Y. P. Goekoop-Ruiterman, None; A. Chopra, None; J. A. P. da Silva, None; P. J. S. M. Kerstens, None; W. F. Lems, Pfizer, Inc., 5,Merck & Co., 5,AbbVie Inc., 5,Roche, 5; S. Tsonaka, None; T. W. J. Huizinga, BMS, 2,EU, 2,Arthritis Foundation, 2,IMI, 2,LUMC, 3,Abblynx, 5,Merck & Co., 5,UCB, Inc., 5,BMS, 5,Biotest AG, 5,Janssen, 5,Pfizer, Inc., 5,Novartis, 5,Roche, 5,Sanofi-Aventis, 5,Abbott, 5,Consulting Bioscience, 5,Galapagos, 5,Nycomed, 5,Boeringher, 5,Takeda, 5,Zydus, 5,Epirus, 5,Eli Lilly and Co., 5; C. F. Allaart, Dutch College of Health Insurances, 2,Schering-Plough B.V., 2,AbbVie, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bergstra SA, van der Pol JA, Riyazi N, Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, Chopra A, da Silva JAP, Kerstens PJSM, Lems WF, Tsonaka S, Huizinga TWJ, Allaart CF. Window or No Window? Earlier Is Better When Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/window-or-no-window-earlier-is-better-when-treating-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/window-or-no-window-earlier-is-better-when-treating-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology