ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1579

Why Do We Need to Pilot Interventions? Essential Refinements Identified During Pilots of a Fatigue Intervention

Emma Dures1, Nicholas Ambler2, Debbie Fletcher3, Denise Pope3, Frances Robinson4, Royston Rooke4 and Sarah Hewlett5, 1University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom, 3University Hospitals Bristol, United Kingdom, 4University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 5Academic Rheumatology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Fatigue and self-management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: An RCT showed a 6 week group cognitive-behavioural (CB) intervention for RA fatigue self-management was effective, when delivered by a clinical psychologist.1 Few rheumatology teams have clinical psychologists; therefore the intervention was re-formatted for delivery by the rheumatology team, in preparation for a multi-centre RCT. We piloted the feasibility of the materials, training, and support for clinicians, plus the acceptability of the intervention for patients.

Methods: The clinical psychologist from the original intervention worked with researchers, patient partners and clinicians to re-format a clinician-led version. A clinician’s programme manual was developed with timetables, session aims, example scripts and patient handouts. A 2-day training for the rheumatology nurse and occupational therapist was developed, focusing on CB approaches (eg Socratic questioning, goal setting), managing groups, and using the session tools (eg activity diaries). They then co-delivered the intervention to 2 patient cohorts, first supervised by the clinical psychologist, then independently with supervised debriefing. On-going refinements were made, based on a cycle of feedback, review and de-briefing during all stages of the piloting.

Results: Materials for non-CB specialists: Some material has been re-written to be more suitable for non-CB specialists to deliver (eg ‘sabotage’ re-written as ‘self-defeating behaviours’); links between sessions, explaining how they build on each other and relate to CB theory, have been made more explicit.

Training: Clinicians expressed anxiety about using new CB skills, and the need to respond rapidly to differences in session discussions that inevitably occur between different patient groups. Thus training will be increased to 4 days, with more focus on CB theory (eg formulating helpful questions) and more practice delivering sessions (eg explaining metaphors).

Support: An increased emphasis on the use of supervised debrief/reflection emerged; thus a guide to debriefing has been added to the manual, and extra time allocated. Proposed clinical supervision/quality control has been increased by adding supervision of any sessions that clinicians find challenging in their second pilot.

Acceptability: Feedback from the 10 patients was positive. Mean scores on rating scales (0-10, higher scores representing greater acceptability) were: satisfaction 8.8, encouragement from clinicians 9.0, sessions well-run 9.0, helpfulness of handouts 8.4, and recommendation of the intervention to other patients 8.8.

Conclusion: Piloting interventions prior to RCT is recommended but there is little evidence about how it influences development. Iterative feedback during piloting led to essential refinements, particularly in training and support, when re-formatting the CBT intervention for delivery by non-CB specialists. It is now ready for formal testing in an RCT.
1 Hewlett et al, Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1060-7


Disclosure:

E. Dures,
None;

N. Ambler,
None;

D. Fletcher,
None;

D. Pope,
None;

F. Robinson,
None;

R. Rooke,
None;

S. Hewlett,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/why-do-we-need-to-pilot-interventions-essential-refinements-identified-during-pilots-of-a-fatigue-intervention/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology