ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 78

Whole Blood Gene Modules Show Differences Between Active Lupus Nephritis and Quiescent Disease As Well As Absence of Plasmablast Signature in This Adult Population

Eric Zollars1, Gerard Hardiman2, Bethany Wolf3, Sean Courtney4, Norm Allaire5, Ann Ranger6 and Michelle Petri7, 1Rheumatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 3Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 5BiogenIdec, Cambridge, MA, 6Unum RX, Cambridge, MA, 7Rheumatology Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Gene Expression, SLE and biomarkers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Genetics, Genomics and Proteomics - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   SLE is a complex disease with heterogeneous manifestations.  It seems unlikely that all patients labeled as SLE have homogenous molecular pathology.  An approach to evaluating the complexity is gene expression, wherein all the transcribed genes are assessed at once. Here we looked at the use of the Chaussabel 2008 modules developed on Affymetrix arrays in a heterogeneous adult SLE patient.   The goal was to evaluate performance in separating disease activity from quiescent disease within lupus.

Methods:   This study was conducted with SLE patients from the Hopkins Lupus Cohort following informed consent. Adult patients were eligible if they were aged 18 to 75 years old and met the definition of SLE as defined by the revised American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.  Clinical and laboratory values were recorded at every visit.  High disease activity was defined as presence of nephritis and significant proteinuria.  Low disease activity was defined as PGA = 0 and the absence of steroids or immunosuppression (other than hydroxychloroquine).  Typical SLE was a random mix of SLE disease activity including nephritis.  Healthy controls were recruited and had no evidence of autoimmune disease.  RNA collected from whole blood and analyzed as previously described [1].  Comparison with the pediatric SLE cohort used publically available data on the NIH GEObus (GSE11909).

Results: Patient characteristics are shown in the below Table 1.

High Activity N=13 Low Activity N=25 Healthy N= 51 Typical SLE N=95
Average Age (sd) 43.9(12) 44(14) 39(11) 46(12)
Ethnicity (%)
  African American 23 44 27 38
  White 62 52 73 58
Average SLEDAI 7 0 NA 2.7
Mycophenolate (N) 6 0 NA 21
Azathioprine (N) 2 0 NA 12
Average Prednisone (mg) 8.5 0 NA 3

Table 1. The 13 patients universally have lupus nephritis at the clinical visit, eight of who were already on therapy.  There are a higher proportion of African Americans in the Low Activity group.  Table 2 shows the results of the modular analysis.  We were not able to demonstrate the significant plasmablast signature seen in the pediatric population.  We were able to show a higher neutrophil signature with the lupus nephritis group.

Table 2. Comparison of modules between patient groups.

Conclusion:   The Chaussabel modules showed notable differences between active lupus nephritis and quiescent disease.  The interferon module, as defined in the 2008 modules, did not markedly differ between the groups analyzed.  The neutrophil module was notably increased in the lupus nephritis population. References:  1. Zollars, E. et al. BAFF (B cell activating factor) transcript level in peripheral blood of patients with SLE is associated with same-day disease activity as well as global activity over the next year. Lupus Sci. Med. 2, (2015)


Disclosure: E. Zollars, None; G. Hardiman, None; B. Wolf, None; S. Courtney, None; N. Allaire, Biogen Idec, 3; A. Ranger, Biogen Idec, 1; M. Petri, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zollars E, Hardiman G, Wolf B, Courtney S, Allaire N, Ranger A, Petri M. Whole Blood Gene Modules Show Differences Between Active Lupus Nephritis and Quiescent Disease As Well As Absence of Plasmablast Signature in This Adult Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/whole-blood-gene-modules-show-differences-between-active-lupus-nephritis-and-quiescent-disease-as-well-as-absence-of-plasmablast-signature-in-this-adult-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/whole-blood-gene-modules-show-differences-between-active-lupus-nephritis-and-quiescent-disease-as-well-as-absence-of-plasmablast-signature-in-this-adult-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology