ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2482

Which Contextual Factors Have An Important Influence On Work Outcome In Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis. A Systematic Literature Review

Jose Dionisio Castillo-Ortiz1,2, Carmen Stolwijk3 and Annelies Boonen1, 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2Unidad de Investigacion en Enfermedades Cronico-Degenerativas, Guadalajara, Mexico, 3School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Work Disability and ankylosing spondylitis (AS)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: It is increasingly recognized that contextual factors (either environmental or personal) play a role in the magnitude in which the disease influences work participation. However, no summary data exist on which factors might be relevant. Therefore, we reviewed the literature on contextual factors in relation to work outcomes in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).

Methods: Medline, EMBASE, PsyINFO and Cinahl as well as references of selected articles were searched systematically up to June 2012. Articles were eligible if reporting original data on the influence of contextual factors (CF) on work disability, sick leave or presenteeism in patients with AS. Assessment of risk of bias and extraction of data were performed by two independent persons. CF were grouped in environmental and personal factors according to the framework proposed by OMERACT (1).. Analyses were marked as ‘high quality’ if the CF was significantly contributing to work outcome in multivariable analyses, after adjustment for disease activity and physical function in a study that had a sufficient samples size for a multivariable analyses.

Results: Out of 1165 studies, 19 met the inclusion criteria of which one was added by hand search (seventeen cross-sectional and two longitudinal); 17 studies addressed employment/WD, three sick leave and 2 presenteeism. For work disability (n=11 studies), there was high quality evidence for the adverse influence of higher age (n= 4), (absence of) work accommodations (n=2), nature of work (n=1), (absence of) workplace support (n=1), (absence of) non-workplace support (n=1), avoidant coping (n=1) and being unmarried (n=1). Evidence was conflicting for gender and education. For sick leave and presenteeism there was no high level evidence for the role of any contextual variable.

Conclusion: Depending on the threshold used to decide whether evidence of the association between a CF and work-outcome can be considered as ‘high quality’, age, work accommodations, nature of work, workplace support and coping/ are candidate variables to be included as important contextual factors of work outcome in addition to disease related variables (function and disease activity). It should be noted all these studies reported cross-sectional associations.


Disclosure:

J. D. Castillo-Ortiz,
None;

C. Stolwijk,
None;

A. Boonen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/which-contextual-factors-have-an-important-influence-on-work-outcome-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-systematic-literature-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology