ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 160

When Compared with a Computerized System Both Experienced and in-Training Sonographers Have Difficulties to Select the Best Doppler Image from a Cine-Loop

Florian Berghea1, Violeta Vlad2, Lavinia Palanciuc3, Violeta Bojinca4, Florentin Vreju5, Luminita Enache6, Monica Copotoiu7, Alexandra Kosevoi8, Teodora Serban9, Denisa Stanciu6, MIHAI ABOBULUI10, Andreea Borangiu11, Andra Rodica Balanescu1 and Ruxandra Ionescu1, 1Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology “Sf. Maria” Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, 2RCRD Research Center, Bucharest, Romania, 3Medical Technology Research Center, Bucharest, Romania, 4RCRD, Bucuresti, Romania, 5Rheumatology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania, 6Rheumatology, 'Dr. Ion Stoia' Clinical Center of Rheumatic Diseases, Bucharest, Romania, 718 Nagy Pal Str., Mures County, Tg. Mures Emergency Hospital, Tg. Mures, Romania, 8Sf. Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, 9Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, "Dr. I Cantacuzino" Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, 10RCRD, BUCHAREST, Romania, 11University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology “Sf. Maria” Hospital, Romania, Bucharest, Romania

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Doppler ultrasound, ultrasonography and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I: Ultrasound, Optical Imaging and Capillaroscopy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Cine-loop analysis is an ultrasound technology that allows the acquisition of images in a digital form as a sequence of a determined frame number. The images can be reviewed as many time as necessary in order to identify the one with the highest level of information. Up to now, in musculoskeletal sonography, this was the prefered techniqueused to select the best Doppler frame (i.e. the image with the highest level of Doppler signal). The frame is subsequently analyzed in quantitative way ( the proportion of total colorized pixels from the total number of existing pixels in a definite region). In order to compare the quantitative Doppler data from different time points a very precise selection of the best Doppler image from a recorded cine-loop is needed. Our study examined the ability of both experienced and in-training sonographers to select the best Doppler image from such a cine-loop using a computerized analytical system as gold standard.

Methods:

The study analised 480 frame selections done in two distinct exercises as following: twenty cine-loops have been recorded using standardized scans; one region of interest (ROI) was marked on each scan and the colorized pixels / total pixels ratio (CTRatio) was computed for each frame of the loop by using an independent software (Retina®). From each loop a number of 4 different frames have been extracted: the one with the highest CTR (named CTR100) and 3 with 5%, 10% and respectively 20% lower level of CTR (named CTR95, CTR90 and CTR80) . All frames emerged from the same loop have been randomly presented to six experienced and six in training sonographers; the request was to select the frame with the highest CTR from each package (twenty packages in total). A similar exercise was performed with CTRs decreasing in steps of 2% (CTR100, CTR98, CTR96, CTR94).

Results:

In the first exercise the CTR100 have been correctly identified in 79.1% cases while in 15.8% of cases CTR95 have been wrongly indicated as CTR100 and in 4.6% of cases theCTR90 was selected. In the 2ndexercise the subjects indicated as CTR100 the following frames: CTR100 in 67% of CTR98 in 18.3%, cases, CTR 96 in 11,6% and CTR94 in 3.1% of cases.

The experienced sonographers performed better than in=training colleagues in both exercises (correct selection in 95 to 75% of cases vs. 90 to 50% of cases in 1st exercise, respectively 90 to 65% of cases vs 75 to 45% of cases in the 2nd exercise).

Conclusion:

Using the computerized analyses as the gold standard,  we demonstrated a large heterogeneity across sonographers regarding their ability to identify the best Doppler image (i.e. the one with the highest CTR) even from a small group of frames. The ability is even more questionable when the differences are small. When the quantitative Doppler signal is assessed in the same patient at different timepoints this lack of ability might induce a significant error. When computerized analyses is feasible it should be used in place of the manual selection.


Disclosure: F. Berghea, None; V. Vlad, None; L. Palanciuc, None; V. Bojinca, None; F. Vreju, None; L. Enache, None; M. Copotoiu, None; A. Kosevoi, None; T. Serban, None; D. Stanciu, None; M. ABOBULUI, None; A. Borangiu, None; A. R. Balanescu, None; R. Ionescu, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Berghea F, Vlad V, Palanciuc L, Bojinca V, Vreju F, Enache L, Copotoiu M, Kosevoi A, Serban T, Stanciu D, ABOBULUI M, Borangiu A, Balanescu AR, Ionescu R. When Compared with a Computerized System Both Experienced and in-Training Sonographers Have Difficulties to Select the Best Doppler Image from a Cine-Loop [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/when-compared-with-a-computerized-system-both-experienced-and-in-training-sonographers-have-difficulties-to-select-the-best-doppler-image-from-a-cine-loop/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/when-compared-with-a-computerized-system-both-experienced-and-in-training-sonographers-have-difficulties-to-select-the-best-doppler-image-from-a-cine-loop/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology