ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 499

What Is the Right Dose to Start Methotrexate (7.5 or 15mg) in Rheumatoid Arthritis? (A Randomized Controlled Trial)

Varun Dhir1, Mandeep Singla2, Palvi Goyal2, Vinay Sagar2, Aman Sharma1 and Shefali K. Sharma2, 1Internal Medicine (Rheumatology Unit), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, 2Internal Medicine (Rheumatology Unit), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Recent recommendations have suggested higher starting doses of methotrexate, i.e. 15 mg/week (3E initiative) in rheumatoid arthritis. However, studies comparing conventional (7.5mg) and newer (15mg) starting dose are limited. Unclear if any difference in control of disease activity or adverse effects with these starting doses.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 100 rheumatoid arthritis patients (fulfilling 1987 ACR), having active disease (‘Disease activity score 28 joints 3 variables’ DAS28-3v³5.1) and not on methotrexate ³ 3 months. Using random number tables, patients were allocated (concealed by envelopes) to two groups – starting methotrexate at 7.5mg or 15 mg/week. Methotrexate escalated by 2.5 mg every 2 weeks; similar folic acid dose (10 mg/week). Patients assessed 4 weekly (blinded assessor) for disease activity (DAS28-3v). In addition, minor adverse effects (symptoms like nausea etc) determined using a performa and major adverse effects determined using blood tests (cytopenias– WBC<4000, Platelet<1lac or transaminitis– ALT or AST>80) or CXR (PA) if required. Analysis by intention to treat; difference in disease activity, adverse effects compared using students t and chi-square test respectively (or Fishers exact). (Trial Reg# NCT01404429)

Results: Patients in the two groups – 7.5 mg and 15 mg had similar age (44.5±10.3, 42.8±11.2 yrs, p=0.4), gender (F:M=36:11, 42:11, p=0.4), disease duration (4.8±4.8, 4.7±4.5 yrs, 0.9), disease activity (DAS28-3v=6.2±0.7, 6.2±0.8, p=0.9) and HAQ (1.3,1.3,p=0.9). In the 7.5 and 15 mg groups, 38 and 46 patients completed study, reaching final methotrexate dose of 19.3±1.8 mg and 24.3±2.0 mg per week respectively. Significant reduction in disease activity in both groups at 12 weeks (p<0.001), however, there was no intergroup difference at 4, 8 or 12 weeks (Figure 1), nor in HAQ at 12 weeks (1.1,0.9,p=0.4). No difference in 7.5 and 15mg groups in episodes of cytopenias (1,2, p=0.9) or transaminitis (6,7, p=0.8) or pneumonitis (0,0). However, minor adverse effects lower in 7.5mg compared to 15mg group (Relative Risk=0.58, 95% CI:0.36-0.95). Common were nausea (more in 15mg), loss of appetite, fatigue and uneasiness. (Table 1)

Conclusion: Starting treatment with either 7.5 mg or 15 mg per week of methotrexate followed by similar fast escalation (5mg/month) is equivalent in control of disease activity at 12 weeks. Although, no difference in transaminitis or cytopenia, higher minor adverse effects, especially nausea in 15mg group.

Table 1: Frequency of minor adverse effects (symptoms) in the two groups

Minor adverse effect (Symptom)

7.5 mg group

15 mg group

P value

Relative Risk 7.5 versus 15 mg

(95% confidence intervals)

Any

31.9

54.7

0.02*

0.58 (0.36-0.95)

Nausea

19.2

39.6

0.02*

0.48(0.25, 0.94)

Fatigue

6.4

13.2

0.43

0.48(0.13, 1.76)

Loss of appetite

12.8

11.3

0.80

1.13(0.39, 3.26)

Diarrhea

0.0

5.7

0.29

0.18 (0.01, 3.62)

Uneasiness or dizziness

17.0

13.2

0.59

1.29 (0.51, 3.28)

* statistically significant

20120626_fig1.png


Disclosure:

V. Dhir,
None;

M. Singla,
None;

P. Goyal,
None;

V. Sagar,
None;

A. Sharma,
None;

S. K. Sharma,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-right-dose-to-start-methotrexate-7-5-or-15mg-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology