Session Information
Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018
Session Type: ACR Poster Session A
Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM
There has been no central reader evaluation of MRI scans from the ASAS Classification Cohort (ASAS-CC)1 to compare detection of lesions between central and ASAS-CC local site readers. Local readers reported active MRI lesions typical of axSpA in the SIJ of 61.6% and 2.2% of patients diagnosed with axSpA and non-axSpA back pain, respectively. Structural lesions were recorded but not reported. We aimed to compare the frequencies of active and structural lesions from the ASAS-CC according to diagnostic category and agreement for their detection between ASAS-CC local site readers and central readers from the ASAS-MRI group.
MRI lesions were recorded in an eCRF that included wording of lesions defining active and structural lesions typical of axSpA that was exactly the same as in the original ASAS-CC eCRF permitting comparisons between central and local site readers. In addition, lesions that met the criteria for an ASAS positive MRI were recorded by central readers. MRI images were available from 276 of the 495 cases who had MRI performed in the ASAS-CC and also had a local rheumatologist expert opinion diagnosis. Image quality was considered sufficient to record global data by 7 central readers in all cases. Lesion frequencies were assessed descriptively according to majority agreement (≥4/7) of central reader data and also any 2 central readers. Agreement for detection of MRI lesions was compared using the kappa coefficient.
Significant differences in lesion frequencies were observed according to diagnostic category (Table 1). However, the frequency of active lesions reported by local readers (61%)was greater than for central readers (43.2%). Structural lesions were also more frequently reported by local readers (42.1%) compared to central readers (34.7%) but less so than active lesions. Agreement for detection of active lesions was good but poor for structural lesions (Table 2).
Local readers may have overestimated the presence of MRI lesions in the ASAS-CC, particularly active lesions. Agreement for detection of structural lesions was limited. The impact on diagnosis by the local rheumatologist cannot be deduced.
1. Rudwaleit et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68: 777-831.
Table 1. Central MRI reader assessment according to diagnostic ascertainment of local physician in the ASAS classification study for all 276 cases with MRI scans of SIJ and baseline local clinical and imaging assessment.
Reader |
MRI Lesion Type |
Local Rheumatologist Diagnosis
|
P value |
|
AxSpA (n=199) |
Not AxSpA (n=77) |
|||
ACTIVE LESIONS |
||||
Local |
Active lesions typical of axSpA |
114 (61.0%)†
|
3 (4.2%)†
|
<0.0001 |
Central (≥4/7 agreement) |
Active lesions typical of axSpA |
86 (43.2%) |
3 (3.9%) |
<0.0001 |
Central (≥4/7 agreement) |
ASAS MRI positive |
79 (39.7%) |
2 (2.6%) |
<0.0001 |
Central (any 2 readers) |
Active lesions typical of axSpA |
96(48.2%) |
7 (9.1%) |
<0.0001 |
Central (any 2 readers) |
ASAS MRI positive |
92 (46.2%) |
6 (7.8%) |
<0.0001 |
STRUCTURAL LESIONS |
||||
Local |
Structural lesions typical of axSpA |
77 (42.1%)# |
6 (8.5%)# |
<0.0001 |
Central (≥4/7 agreement) |
Structural lesions typical of axSpA |
69 (34.7%) |
6 (7.8%) |
<0.0001 |
Central (any 2 readers) |
Structural lesions typical of axSpA |
94 (47.2%) |
10 (13%) |
<0.0001 |
† Total with clinical and MRI data = 258
# Total with clinical and MRI data = 254
Table 2. Agreement between central and local readers for active and structural lesions typical for axSpA.
Local Reader
|
|
Central Readers |
|||
|
Active lesion (any 2 readers) |
Active Lesion (≥4 readers) |
|||
|
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Active lesion |
Yes |
85 |
32 |
78 |
39 |
No |
14 |
127 |
8 |
133 |
|
Kappa (95% CI) |
0.64 (0.54-0.73) |
0.62 (0.53-0.72) |
|||
Structural lesion |
Yes |
58 |
25 |
43 |
40 |
No |
41 |
130 |
27 |
144 |
|
Kappa (95% CI) |
0.44 (0.32 to 0.55) |
0.38 (0.25 to 0.50) |
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Maksymowych WP, Baraliakos X, Lambert RG, Weber U, Sieper J, Wichuk S, Poddubnyy D, Østergaard M, Paschke J, Pedersen SJ, Machado P. What Is the Level of Agreement between Local and Central Readers in the Detection of Active and Structural MRI Lesions Typical of Axial Spondyloarthritis? Data from the Assessments in Spondyloarthritis Classification Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-level-of-agreement-between-local-and-central-readers-in-the-detection-of-active-and-structural-mri-lesions-typical-of-axial-spondyloarthritis-data-from-the-assessments-in-spondyloarthriti/. Accessed .« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-level-of-agreement-between-local-and-central-readers-in-the-detection-of-active-and-structural-mri-lesions-typical-of-axial-spondyloarthritis-data-from-the-assessments-in-spondyloarthriti/