ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1512

What Is the Best Referral Strategy for Axial Spondyloarthritis? A Prospective Multicenter Study of 515 Patients with Suspicious Chronic Low Back Pain

Nelly Ziade1, Avin Maroof2, Bassel Elzorkany3, Nizar Ani4, ASAL ADNAN RIDHA5, Ahmed Abogamal6, Sahar Saad7, Lina El Kibbi8, Samar Al emadi9, Atheer Al Ansari10, Antonella Abi Najm1, Tonine Younan1, Khalil Kharrat1, Joseph Maarrawi1, Amer Sebaaly1, Rami El Rachkidi1, Torsten Witte11 and Xenofon Baraliakos12, 1Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon, 2Rizgary Teaching Hospital - Erbil, Erbil, Iraq, 3Department of Rheumatology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 4Baghdad College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq, 5Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq, 6Saudi German Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 7King Hamad University Hospital, Al Sayh, Bahrain, 8Specialized Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 9Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, 10Mediclinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 11MH-Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 12Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Herne, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Diagnostic criteria, risk assessment, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is often delayed, due to the referral issues and, in certain regions of the world, the low prevalence of HLA-B27. The objectives of the study were to assess the value of the referral strategies for axSpA in patients with suspicious chronic low back pain (LBP) and to identify the predictive factors of axSpA.

Methods: The study was multicentric, prospective, and conducted in LBP first-line clinics (rheumatology, internal medicine, family medicine, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and neurology). Adult patients aged under 45 years were included in case of LBP “suspicious” of inflammatory nature according to the primary physician and requiring referral to the rheumatologist. The diagnostic properties of the available referral strategies for axSpA (Brandt I, II, III, Hermann, RADAR, RADAR 2/3, MASTER, Braun, CAFASPA and ASAS) and those of Inflammatory Back Pain (IBP) (Calin, Berlin and ASAS classification criteria) were calculated taking the final diagnosis of the reference rheumatologist as the gold standard. A multivariable logistic regression identified the clinical predictive factors of axSpA.

Results: The study included 515 patients from 7 Middle Eastern countries from April 2020 to April 2022. The diagnosis of axSpA was confirmed in 249 patients (48%), refuted in 222 patients (43%), and remained uncertain in 44 patients (9%). The average age of patients was 34.8 years [SD 7.1], 46.1% were males, and the average symptom duration was 5.9 years [SD 4.9] (Table 1). The ASAS criteria were fulfilled in 83.1% of axSpA patients and 2.7% of patients without axSpA. The optimal reference strategy (highest positive likelihood ratio (LR+ 3.3) was the MASTER strategy (Table 2), which comprises IBP, good response to NSAIDs, positive HLA-B27, and SpA family history. Considering strategies not including HLA-B27, the RADAR 2/3 strategy (IBP, good response to NSAIDs, any extra-musculoskeletal manifestation (EMMs)) had a good LR+ of 2.9. The optimal IBP classification criteria were the ASAS criteria (LR+ 2.0). The most predictive factors for a positive axSpA diagnosis were an MRI sacroiliitis, positive HLA-B27, high CRP level, psoriasis, IBP, and longer symptom duration. When considering only clinical features, the most predictive factors were uveitis, IBP, family SpA, psoriasis, enthesitis, and male gender (Table 3).

Conclusion: The optimal reference strategy was the MASTER strategy, a simple strategy based on IBP, good response to NSAIDs, a positive HLA-B27, and family history of SpA. Among clinical factors, IBP and EMMs (uveitis, psoriasis), and family SpA had a crucial role in predicting the diagnosis of axSpA. Increasing physicians’ awareness of these clinical features may enhance referral and expedite early diagnosis of axSpA.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patients’ Characteristics

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Diagnostic Value of Referral Strategies For the Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis

Supporting image 3

Table 3. Predictive clinical factors of the final diagnosis of axSpA in multivariable logistic regression


Disclosures: N. Ziade, Pfizer, Roche, AbbVie/Abbott, Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen; A. Maroof, None; B. Elzorkany, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eva, Hekma, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, New Bridge, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier; N. Ani, None; A. RIDHA, None; A. Abogamal, None; S. Saad, None; L. El Kibbi, None; S. Al emadi, None; A. Al Ansari, None; A. Abi Najm, None; T. Younan, None; K. Kharrat, None; J. Maarrawi, None; A. Sebaaly, None; R. El Rachkidi, None; T. Witte, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Galapagos; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ziade N, Maroof A, Elzorkany B, Ani N, RIDHA A, Abogamal A, Saad S, El Kibbi L, Al emadi S, Al Ansari A, Abi Najm A, Younan T, Kharrat K, Maarrawi J, Sebaaly A, El Rachkidi R, Witte T, Baraliakos X. What Is the Best Referral Strategy for Axial Spondyloarthritis? A Prospective Multicenter Study of 515 Patients with Suspicious Chronic Low Back Pain [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-best-referral-strategy-for-axial-spondyloarthritis-a-prospective-multicenter-study-of-515-patients-with-suspicious-chronic-low-back-pain/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-is-the-best-referral-strategy-for-axial-spondyloarthritis-a-prospective-multicenter-study-of-515-patients-with-suspicious-chronic-low-back-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology