ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2971

What Do Reduced 28 Joint Counts Miss in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis?

Andreas Kerschbaumer1, Josef S. Smolen1,2 and Daniel Aletaha1, 1Medical University Vienna, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Vienna, Austria, 22nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: outcome measures and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment V

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose:

Clinical joint assessment by the rheumatologist is a key examination of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PSA). A clinically swollen joint is predicting subsequent joint damage. Since joint assessment is regarded time-consuming, a tension exists between comprehensiveness, e.g. using complete joint counts (JC; 76/78 or 66/68), and feasibility.  Reduced JC, such as the 28 joint count, however, may be less valuable in PSA than RA due to differences in joint patterns.

Here, we examined the validity of a reduced 28 swollen and tender JC, using the extended JCas comparators.

Methods:

We analyzed data from a random subset of 80% of patients enrolled in the ADEPT (n=264) and the IMPACT-2 trial (n=163). In ADEPT a 76/78 JC was performed, in IMPACT-2, it was the 66/68 JC only. At week 24 of the two trials, patients with a complete absence of SJC or TJC by the 28-count were analyzed for their residual joint activity. Sensitivity and NPV for each joint count were calculated for each study. Finally, we analyzed the residual tender and swollen joints of 76/78 and 66/68 JC remained active in patients with a 28-joint count of 0 at endpoint.

Results:

As summarized in table 1, investigation of SJC at week 24 in ADEPT showed that 63 of all 264 patients (23.9 %) achieved a SJC28=0; of these 63 patients, 51 (81%) also had a SJC66=0 and 50 (79.4 %) had a SJC76=0. Twelve and 13 patients, respectively, had residual SJC76 or SJC66 while having a SJC28=0. Of the 52 patients with a TJC28=0, 41 and 39, respectively, had also TJC78=0 and TJC68=0, while 11 and 13 patients had residual TJC68 or TJC78.

In IMPACT2, 50 of 163 patients (30.7%) achieved SJC28 remission, with 15 patients (30%) of these remaining active by SJC66. TJC28 remission was achieved by 44 patients, with 17 patients (38.6 %) not achieving complete TJC68 remission.

Exploration of individual residual swollen and tender joints showed mainly foot and ankle joints being active/tender at week 24, as can be seen in figure 1.

Conclusion:

Absence of swelling by the 28 joint count in PsA seems to not adequately reflect the situation of all relevant joints, as in at least one of four patients residual clinical activity is detectable by more comprehensive 76/78 and 66/68 joint counts. Assessment of ankle and foot joints, especially MTPs, contributed numerically most to the missed joints. These limitations should be considered when treating PsA patients to target.

 

Table 1: 28-joint counts versus 66/68 and 76/78 joint counts in ADEPT and IMPACT-2.

ADEPT

SJC 66

SJC 76

SJC66 = 0

SJC66 > 0

Total

Sensitivity

SJC76 = 0

SJC76 > 0

Total

Sensitivity

SJC 28

SJC28 = 0

51

12

63

0.81

50

13

63

0.79

SJC 28 > 0

0

201

201

NPV

0

201

201

NPV

Total

51

213

264

0.94

50

214

264

0.94

TJC 68

TJC 78

TJC68 = 0

TJC68 > 0

Total

Sensitivity

TJC78 = 0

TJC78 > 0

Total

Sensitivity

TJC 28

TJC28 = 0

41

11

52

0.79

39

13

52

0.75

TJC28 > 0

0

212

212

NPV

0

212

212

NPV

Total

41

223

264

0.95

39

225

264

0.94

IMPACT-2

SJC 66

SJC66 = 0

SJC66 > 0

Total

Sensitivity

SJC 28

SJC28 = 0

35

15

50

0.7

SJC 28 > 0

0

113

113

NPV

Total

35

128

163

0.88

TJC 68

TJC68 = 0

TJC68 > 0

Total

Sensitivity

TJC 28

TJC28 = 0

27

17

44

0.61

TJC28 > 0

0

119

119

NPV

Total

27

136

163

0.88

Figure 1: Swollen (red) and tender (blue) joints for all patients at baseline (A+C) and patients JC28=0 at week 24 (B+D).


Disclosure: A. Kerschbaumer, None; J. S. Smolen, None; D. Aletaha, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kerschbaumer A, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. What Do Reduced 28 Joint Counts Miss in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-do-reduced-28-joint-counts-miss-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-do-reduced-28-joint-counts-miss-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology