ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1739

What Do Patient Reported Outcomes for Routine Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Tract Symptoms in a Systemic Sclerosis Center Tell Us about Clinical Features of Potential Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth?

Jessica Zhu1, Craig Gale2, Joshua Biber3, Mandana Nikpour4, Murray Baron5 and Tracy M. Frech6, 1School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Bioinformatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 4The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 5Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gastrointestinal complications, patient outcomes and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of clinical practice.  The use of gastrointestinal (GI) PROMs is particularly important in systemic sclerosis (SSc), especially for the identification of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), where hydrogen breath testing for definitive diagnosis is difficult to perform.  In this report, we examine the clinical correlates of two validated GI PROM scores in SSc to inform the design of a pragmatic trial in SSc SIBO.

Methods: Patients seen at a single center SSc Clinic, who met the 2013 ACR/EULAR Criteria and were enrolled in the INSYNC registry received an electronic link to a personal health assessment questionnaire that included the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium University of California Los Angeles Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT 2.0) and gastrointestinal global symptom score (GSS), which have previously been validated in the SSc population. The GIT 2.0 (34 questions) provides a total score of GIT severity, and is calculated by an average of all scales (questions 1-8 reflux, 9-12 distention/boating, 13 soilage, 14-15 diarrhea, 16-21 social function, 22-30 emotional well-being, 31-34 constipation), except constipation.  The scores range from mild (0-0.49) to severe-to very-severe (1.01-3). The GSS assesses nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, diarrhea, constipation, abdominal tenderness, dysuria, tenesmus, fever and general illness/malaise, with each symptom scored from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). It has previously been reported in the SSc population that a GSS ≥ 5 is predictive of SIBO. We compared the GIT 2.0 scores in those with GSS <5 and ≥ 5, using the t-test, with significance set at 5%.

Results:  From January to May 2018, 43 SSc patients completed both the SCTC GIT 2.0 and GSS (59 % completion rate).  These patients were 95% female, 67% limited cutaneous subtype, 73% scleroderma-specific autoantibodies (40.5% centromere, 13.5% SCL70, 18.9% RNApol3), with an average disease duration of 13.5 years. The subscales of GIT 2.0 according to GSS are shown in Table 1. As expected the potential SIBO patients with a GSS ≥ 5 had significantly more distention/bloating (p=0.001), but unexpectedly more constipation (p=0.04) on the GIT 2.0. 

Conclusion:  Gastrointestinal complaints are common in SSc and PROM questionnaires are an essential aspect of care, but the optimal number of questions and mode of questionnaire delivery are important as evidenced by our completion rate. If a GSS ≥ 5 represents SIBO, then this study suggests that subscales of the GIT 2.0 may be able to effectively capture this disease entity. The social functioning and emotional well-being domains of GIT 2.0 warrant further study in SIBO patients.

Table 1: Subscales of the GIT 2.0 according to GSS (with > 5 possibly identifying SIBO)

GIT 2.0 Subscales

GSS ≥ 5  (n=24)

GSS < 5 (n=19)

p-value

Reflux

0.83

0.46

0.051

Distention/Bloating

1.28

0.57

0.001

Diarrhea

0.65

0.34

0.093

Social

0.56

0.13

0.002

Emotional

0.65

0.15

0.001

Constipation

0.67

0.29

0.043

Soilage

0.33

0.11

0.171



Disclosure: J. Zhu, None; C. Gale, None; J. Biber, None; M. Nikpour, Actelion, GSK, Pfizer, BMS, Eli Lilly, UCB, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, 2, 5; M. Baron, None; T. M. Frech, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zhu J, Gale C, Biber J, Nikpour M, Baron M, Frech TM. What Do Patient Reported Outcomes for Routine Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Tract Symptoms in a Systemic Sclerosis Center Tell Us about Clinical Features of Potential Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-do-patient-reported-outcomes-for-routine-monitoring-of-gastrointestinal-tract-symptoms-in-a-systemic-sclerosis-center-tell-us-about-clinical-features-of-potential-small-intestinal-bacterial-overg/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-do-patient-reported-outcomes-for-routine-monitoring-of-gastrointestinal-tract-symptoms-in-a-systemic-sclerosis-center-tell-us-about-clinical-features-of-potential-small-intestinal-bacterial-overg/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology