ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1251

Vulnerability Features Are Common in Coronary Plaques of Asymptomatic Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Controls: Associations with Lipid and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

George A. Karpouzas1, Jennifer Malpeso2, Tae-Young Choi2, Silvia Munoz1 and Matthew Budoff2, 1Rheumatology, Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA, 2Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Clinical Features & Comorbidity/Cardiovascular Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) reliably evaluates coronary plaque presence, severity, burden, and composition. CT characteristics of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) include low attenuation plaques (LAP) consistent with necrotic core, positive remodeling (PR) and spotty calcifications. Increasing numbers of those vulnerability features yields progressively higher risk for future ACS (within 2 years) compared to their absence. We studied 150 asymptomatic, patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and an equal number of age and sex-matched controls for plaque vulnerability features using CTA.

Methods: A standard 15-segment American Heart Association model was used for evaluation. Plaque composition was defined as non-calcified (NCP), mixed- partially calcified (MP), or fully calcified (CP). Plaques in both groups were evaluated for all 3 vulnerability features. Fasting lipid assessments, including total Cholesterol (TC), HDL-c, LDL-c, VLDL-c, particle sizes thereof, and apolipoproteins B100 and A1 were completed. Both IgG and IgM antibodies against oxidized LDL in relative light units (RLU), as well as oxidized phospholipids on apoB100 particles were measured as indicators of oxidative stress. Non-parametric ANOVA and Fisher’s tests were used as appropriate for comparisons among groups.

Results: In the RA group, 107 (71%) patients had a total of 303 plaques, compared to 68 (45%) in the controls with 135 plaques (p<0.0001). Twenty-four (16%) RA subjects had 41 plaques with ≥1 vulnerable characteristic (VP+) compared to none in the control group (p<0.0001, table); 8 (5.3%) had plaques with≥2, and 6 (4%) had all 3 characteristics. Thirty-one of 84 (37%) MP in RA had ≥1 VP characteristic, compared to 10/156 (6.4%) of NCP (p<0.0001); higher numbers of VP features were only present on MP. In general, VP were moderately sized and 66% rendered <50% luminal stenosis. Subjects with vulnerable plaque features (VP+) had higher Framingham scores, TC/HDL-c (pro-atherogenic index), small particle LDL (LDL4), and apoB/A1 ratio, compared to those with plaque lacking vulnerability characteristics (VP-), or those without plaque (table).

Conclusion: Coronary plaques of asymptomatic patients with RA frequently display vulnerability features, by contrast to controls, and increasing numbers of those segregate preferentially on moderate sized, non-occlusive MP. Their presence associates with higher Framingham scores, pro-atherogenic index, smaller sized oxidation-prone LDL, and apoB/A1 ratios.

Parameter

VP (+)

VP (-)

Plaque (-)

p-value

RA-n patients=150

24

83

43

<0.0001

Controls-n patients=150

0

68

82

RA-n plaques=303

41

262

n/a

<0.0001

Controls-n plaques=135

0

135

n/a

Parameters in subjects with RA (mean± SEM)

Framingham Score

6.3±1.3

3.6±0.5

2±0.5

<0.0001

Total Cholesterol (mg/dl)

175.7±8.2

170.2±3.9

161.5±4.8

0.26

HDL-c (mg/dl)

46.7±2.5

53.2±1.5

49.9±2.4

0.07

Total Chol/ HDL ratio

3.92±0.21

3.36±0.11

3.43±0.14

0.026

HDL2 (md/dl)

12.1±1.2

15.2±0.8

13.5±1.1

0.06

HDL3 (mg/dl)

34.7±1.5

38.1±0.8

36.3±1.4

0.15

LDL-total (mg/dl)

104±6.5

94.6±3.7

92.6±3.6

0.2

LDL1 (mg/dl)

14.2±1.4

13.2±0.8

12.8±0.9

0.7

LDL2 (mg/dl)

21±2.7

21.9±1.4

22.7±1.7

0.7

LDL3 (mg/dl)

37.1±2.8

30.6±1.5

31.4±1.6

0.09

LDL4 (mg/dl)

12.5±1.5

9.1±0.7

8.4±1.1

0.01

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

163.4±20.5

142.5±10

144.7±11.9

0.6

VLDL1, 2 (mg/dl)

11.3±1.3

9.9±0.5

9.5±0.5

0.5

VLDL3 (mg/dl)

13.7±0.8

12.7±0.4

11.7±0.4

0.1

ApoB/A1 ratio

0.64±0.03

0.56±0.02

0.59±0.02

0.045

OxPL/apoB100 (NanoM PC)

11.4±1.2

11.7±0.5

11.4±0.9

0.7

Ox-MDA-LDL IgG (RLU)

14,366±2,490

11,095±707

10,587±1,011

0.7

Ox-MDA-LDL IgM (RLU)

28,195±2,833

28,082±1,169

27,036±1,365

1

 

 


Disclosure:

G. A. Karpouzas,
None;

J. Malpeso,
None;

T. Y. Choi,
None;

S. Munoz,
None;

M. Budoff,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vulnerability-features-are-common-in-coronary-plaques-of-asymptomatic-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-compared-to-controls-associations-with-lipid-and-oxidative-stress-biomarkers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology