ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 818

Visual Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective Multi Center Study

Faidra Laskou1, Tin Aung2, Dawn Gayford3, Siwalik Banerjee2, Cynthia S. Crowson4, Eric L. Matteson5 and Bhaskar Dasgupta6, 1Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend, UK, Southend-On-Sea, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend, UK, Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom, 3Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend, UK, westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom, 4Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 5Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 6Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Giant cell arteritis and patient outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Vasculitis Poster I: Non-ANCA-Associated and Related Disorders

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Under reporting of visual impairment attributable to GCA is likely; certificates of visual impairment do not include GCA as a category. Delayed presentation, recognition and treatment are in most cases the reasons that sight loss (SL) is still present in 15-25% of patients at diagnosis. A “Yellow card reporting system” enabled us to characterise the spectrum and severity of visual involvement (VI) attributable to GCA.

Methods:

We recorded patients prospectively, with new or relapsing diagnosis of GCA who presented with or without VI over a period of 2 years. We collected demographic information, symptomatology at presentation, medical history, date/dose of initiation of steroids, response to treatment, laboratory results, confirmatory investigations as ultrasound of temporal arteries, biopsy or /and PET, presence of VI with or without loss of acuity, persistence of visual symptoms and findings from formal ophthalmology assessment. SL was defined as symptomatic loss of acuity, field of vision or diplopia ascribable to ischaemic complications of GCA. Patients with transient visual symptoms were not considered to have SL. Analyses were performed using chi-squared and rank sum tests

Results:

388 patients were enrolled from 19 sites. 135 (35%) presented with VI. Patients with VI had mean age of 75.9 (SD 9.3) years, were predominantly females 95 (70%) and all were Caucasian. Headache (84% vs 92%, p=0.012) and scalp tenderness (61% vs75%, p=0.005) were less common, but jaw (57% vs 46%, p=0.040) and tongue claudication (13% vs 4%, p=0.004) were more common at presentation in patients with VI than in those without. Median duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 2.0 (IQR 1.0-4.0) weeks. Information was missing regarding type and severity of VI from 4 patients. 33/131 presented with diplopia, 51 with arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (AION), 7 with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO); changes were permanent in 36/58 and 5 patients experienced AION as manifestation of recrudescing disease. Headache (75% vs 92%, p<0.001) and myalgia/stiffness (25% vs 44%, p=0.011) were less common in patients who presented with AION/CRAO than those without. Patients with AION/CRAO were older [mean age 80.9 (SD 6.7) years] compared to those without [73.2 (SD 8.7) years, p<0.001]. History of hypertension was more common (70% vs 46%, p=0.001) and hemoglobin levels were lower (mean 119.9 mg/dl (SD 16.5) vs 124.4 (SD 15.4), p=0.018). Patients with SL presented quicker with median duration of symptoms of 2.0 (IQR 1.0-4.0) vs 3.0 (IQR 1.4-6.0) weeks (p=0.016). 44/92 patients who presented with SL had at least unilaterally reduced visual acuity: counting fingers (3), hand movements (4), no light perception (7), light perception (3), 1 reported as blind and 25 had variable severity of unilateral visual acuity loss (from 6/18 to 6/120 based on Snellen chart).

Conclusion:

Visual symptoms often leading to SL in GCA require urgent management. Patients with VI were older, without ‘typical symptoms’ such as headache and polymyalgia but more likely to have ischaemic symptoms, such as jaw and tongue pain and hypertension. Recognition of VI associated features should be embodied in public and professional awareness programs to prevent permanent SL in GCA.


Disclosure: F. Laskou, None; T. Aung, None; D. Gayford, None; S. Banerjee, None; C. S. Crowson, None; E. L. Matteson, None; B. Dasgupta, Roche, 9,GlaxoSmithKline, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Laskou F, Aung T, Gayford D, Banerjee S, Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Visual Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective Multi Center Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/visual-involvement-in-giant-cell-arteritis-a-prospective-multi-center-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/visual-involvement-in-giant-cell-arteritis-a-prospective-multi-center-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology