ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 504

Views of Primary Care Physicians and Rheumatologists Regarding Screening and Management of Hyperlipidemia Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Iris Navarro-Millán1,2, Anna Cornelius-Schecter2, Ronan O'Beirne3, Melanie Morris3, Susan Goodman1, Andrea Cherrington3, Liana Fraenkel4, Jeffrey R. Curtis3 and Monika M. Safford2, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Yale University, New Haven, CT

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Cholesterol, primary care, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatologic practice

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I: Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Screening and management of hyperlipidemia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is suboptimal, despite RA patients’ high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Our purpose was to identify barriers to screening for hyperlipidemia among patients with RA from the viewpoint of primary care physicians (PCPs) and rheumatologists.

Methods: We recruited rheumatologists and PCPs nationally to participate in moderated, structured group teleconference discussions using the nominal group technique. The groups had either only PCPs or only rheumatologists. Participants generated lists of barriers to screening and management for hyperlipidemia in patients with RA, within the same session. Each participant was allowed 6 votes to rank items: 3 votes for the most important item, 2 for the second most important, and 1 to the third most important. Investigators characterized items and totaled the votes as themes and sub-themes.

Results: Twenty-six rheumatologists participated in 1 of 3 groups (group size ranged from 7-11) and 22 PCPs participated in 1 of 3 groups (group size ranged from 4-9). The items generated across the 6 separate groups were categorized into physician-, patient- and system-level barriers. Table 1 lists the barriers for hyperlipidemia screening and Table 2 lists the barriers for management of hyperlipidemia for both rheumatologists and PCPs.

The largest number of barriers for rheumatologists were at the physician level (e.g. ‘ownership’ of hyperlipidemia screening and management), with 83% of the priority votes for screening and 89% for treatment. Patient-level barriers received the majority of votes among the PCPs groups (44% for screening and 69% for management).

Conclusion: Our data showed that rheumatologists are conflicted about whether management of CVD risk reduction strategies among patients with RA should fall within the role of the rheumatologist or PCP. PCPs are more concerned about the overall effect of RA and its treatment in the context of screening and managing hyperlipidemia. These findings improve our understanding of why RA patients are not consistently screened and treated for hyperlipidemia. To address this gap, there is a need to develop strategies that clarify the specific roles of the PCP and rheumatologist and develop solutions that target key barriers.


Disclosure: I. Navarro-Millán, None; A. Cornelius-Schecter, None; R. O'Beirne, None; M. Morris, None; S. Goodman, None; A. Cherrington, None; L. Fraenkel, None; J. R. Curtis, None; M. M. Safford, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Navarro-Millán I, Cornelius-Schecter A, O'Beirne R, Morris M, Goodman S, Cherrington A, Fraenkel L, Curtis JR, Safford MM. Views of Primary Care Physicians and Rheumatologists Regarding Screening and Management of Hyperlipidemia Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/views-of-primary-care-physicians-and-rheumatologists-regarding-screening-and-management-of-hyperlipidemia-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/views-of-primary-care-physicians-and-rheumatologists-regarding-screening-and-management-of-hyperlipidemia-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology