ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2392

Vibration Perception Threshold and Hip Osteoarthritis in Multicenter Ostoearthritis Study

Chan Kim1,2, Najia Shakoor3, Anyu Hu4, Jingbo Niu5, Ali Guermazi6 and David T. Felson5, 1Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 3Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 4Clinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 5Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 6Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Hip, neuropathy and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster II: Biomarkers, Biomechanics and Health Services Research

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Vibration
Perception Threshold and Hip Osteoarthritis in Multicenter Ostoearthritis Study

Background/Purpose:

It
is hypothesized that reduced sense of position in space leading to increased
impact force and unbalanced foot strike during gait contributes to osteoarthritis
(OA).  In previous work from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST), we
reported that high VPTs were associated with knee OA especially in men and
women aged 65 or greater.  However, the association of VPT and hip OA has not
been studied for a large population.  It is unclear whether sensory deficits
which are mostly distal can lead to hip OA.  We examined the association of
vibratory sense with radiographic hip OA in participants of MOST. 

Methods:

MOST
is a NIH funded longitudinal study that recruited participants at risk for knee
OA.  We carried out a cross sectional assessment of vibration perception
threshold (VPT) and hip OA at the 60 month exam. Using a protocol from knee OA
studies, we measured VPT at 3 anatomical bony sites: 1st MTP, tibial
tuberosity, and radial styloid.  VPT measures the voltage threshold at which a
subject senses vibration, thus a higher VPT threshold represents a greater
sensory deficit.  Long limb radiographs obtained at the same visit were read for
radiographic hip OA (RHOA) using criteria devised at UCSF that incorporated
features of modified Croft criteria.  Symptomatic hip OA (SHOA) was defined as
hips with pain and RHOA.  Persons with total knee replacements, total hip
replacements and diabetes were excluded from this analysis. 

Because
large differences in VPT exist between genders and age, men and women were evaluated
separately and divided into age subgroups: <65 years and ≥65 years. 
The unaffected hips of persons with unilateral RHOA may be intermediate in VPT
between hips with OA and normal hips without any radiographic knee OA, so a
limb-based analysis was performed with three hip groups:  1) RHOA; 2)
contralateral “normal” hip of unilateral RHOA; and 3) control hip (no RHOA in
either hip).  Statistical analysis entailed using linear regression with GEE to
compare VPT between groups adjusted for age, BMI, radiographic knee OA, and
accounting for the correlation between hips.

Results:

VPT
was assessed in 612 men and 930 women.  Of the 612 men, 72 hips were excluded from
analysis (missing RHOA status due to poor quality radiographs).  Of the 930
women, 99 hips were excluded.  For both men and women for all age groups, VPTs
were not higher for those with RHOA or SHOA compared to controls (results only
shown for men age < 65 years).  VPTs at the radial styloid on the non-OA side
for those with unilateral RHOA and SHOA were significantly lower than controls
for men age < 65 years.    

Conclusion:

 

In
MOST, RHOA was not associated with any meaningful alteration in VPT.

 

Radiographic hip OA for men (age < 65 years)*

 

 

 

Mean VPT  (95% CI)

P value (compared to control)

Mean VPT  (95% CI) adjusted for BMI and age

P value (compared to control)

MTP

RHOA

16.64 (13.66, 19.62)

0.24

16.65 (13.87, 19.44)

0.25

 

Contralateral

18.28 (13.53, 22.94)

0.90

18.16 (13.48, 22.84)

0.91

 

Controls

18.60 (17.23, 19.96)

 

18.45 (17.14, 19.77)

 

Tibial tuberosity

RHOA

20.29 (17.08, 23.51)

0.83

20.30 (17.31, 23.28)

0.89

 

Contralateral

18.00 (15.33, 20.67)

0.07

17.80 (15.21, 20.40)

0.06

 

Controls

20.67 (19.56, 21.77)

 

20.53 (19.48, 21.58)

 

Radial styloid

RHOA

8.54 (7.79, 9.28)

0.96

8.50 (7.75, 9.25)

0.96

 

Contralateral

7.60 (6.92, 8.27)

0.02

7.54 (6.82, 8.26)

0.02

 

Controls

8.51 (8.18, 8.85)

 

8.52 (8.19, 8.86)

 

Symptomatic hip OA for men (age < 65 years)*

 

MTP

RHOA

15.32 (11.97, 18.67)

0.09

14.85 (11.94, 17.76)

0.03

 

Contralateral

15.82 (11.52, 20.12)

0.26

15.28 (11.84, 18.72)

0.10

 

Controls

18.41 (17.15, 19.67)

 

18.37 (17.13, 19.62)

 

Tibial tuberosity

RHOA

17.18 (12.40, 21.96)

0.18

16.95 (13.10, 20.80)

0.08

 

Contralateral

15.56 (10.88, 20.24)

0.04

15.21 (11.43, 19.00)

0.01

 

Controls

20.56 (19.53, 21.59)

 

20.53 (19.54, 21.53)

 

Radial styloid

RHOA

7.99 (6.77, 9.21)

0.43

7.89 (6.64, 9.14)

0.35

 

Contralateral

7.14 (6.03, 8.25)

0.02

7.02 (5.76, 8.28)

0.02

 

Controls

8.49 (8.19, 8.79)

 

8.51 (8.20, 8.81)

 

* Adjusted for age, BMI, site, and knee radiographic knee OA

 


Disclosure: C. Kim, None; N. Shakoor, Dr. Comfort- Flex OA shoes, 7; A. Hu, None; J. Niu, None; A. Guermazi, Boston Imaging Core Lab, LLC, 1,TissueGene, 5,OrthoTrophix, 5,MerckSerono, 5,Genzyme Corporation, 5; D. T. Felson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kim C, Shakoor N, Hu A, Niu J, Guermazi A, Felson DT. Vibration Perception Threshold and Hip Osteoarthritis in Multicenter Ostoearthritis Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vibration-perception-threshold-and-hip-osteoarthritis-in-multicenter-ostoearthritis-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vibration-perception-threshold-and-hip-osteoarthritis-in-multicenter-ostoearthritis-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology