ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1049

Very Low Uptake of Biosimilar Adalimumab in the First 9 Months of Availability in Rheumatology

Eric Roberts1, Gabriela Schmajuk2 and Jinoos Yazdany3, 1University of California, San Francisco, SF, CA, 2UCSF / SFVA, San Francisco, CA, 3UCSF, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, Economics, Health policy, Pharmacoepidemiology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Health Services Research – ACR/ARP Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: In 2021, over 300,000 patients in the United States used adalimumab, making it one of the highest-grossing drugs globally. In 2023, patent exclusivity for the bio-originator form of adalimumab expired and eight biosimilars were introduced to the U.S. market. The arrival of these biosimilars has been eagerly awaited given the potential to reduce costs and improve access.  Here we assess uptake of biosimilar adalimumab in the first nine months of 2023 overall, by patient characteristics and by practice. 

Methods: Data derive from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry, a national EHR database from over 1100 US rheumatologists.  We included 11,571 patients age > 18 years, with Medicare, Medicaid or private insurance, administered adalimumab (bio-originator or biosimilar) between Jan 2023 to Sept 2023.  To evaluate new starts, we defined a subset of users with a visit in the 365 days before initiating use without a prescription for adalimumab. To assess switching, we considered a patient’s first (if any) change in prescription. We report the uptake of biosimilars overall and analyze the demographic and clinical factors associated with uptake using standardized mean differences.  We assessed the distribution of uptake for each biosimilar product, the percent of new starts on a biosimilar, and the frequency of switching to a biosimilar. Among practices, we also calculated the median percent of patients prescribed a biosimilar. 

Results: In the first nine months of 2023, 253 of 11,571 (2.2%) patients received a prescription for a biosimilar version of adalimumab.  There were only small differences in uptake by demographics or clinical characteristics with the largest differences by insurance and geographic region. Those with private insurance (2.5%) or Medicaid (2.8%) were more likely to use a biosimilar than those with Medicare (1.2%). Patients in the Midwest (3.3%) and West (3.2%) were more likely to receive a biosimilar than patients in the Northeast (1.3%) or South (1.8%) (Table 1).  70.4% (n=181) of biosimilar prescriptions were adalimumab-atto, which was the first released. Among new starts, 143 of 5133 (2.8%) were on a biosimilar. 96 patients switched from bio-originator adalimumab to a biosimilar and 14 patients switched from biosimilar to bio-originator. By practice (n=126), the median percent of patients receiving biosimilar adalimumab was 0.8% (IQR: 0 – 2.1%) with 10 practices having >10% of patients on biosimilar adalimumab (Figure 1).

Conclusion: We found critically low uptake of biosimilar adalimumab in the first nine months of 2023.  Early indications are that formulary coverage has been uneven with a much higher percentage of formularies covering bio-originator adalimumab and no formularies have given a biosimilar a preferential tier or mandated step therapy.  Delayed uptake of biosimilars means reduced savings for patients and tax payers, and discourages market entry for future biosimilars.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Demographic, clinical and socioeconomic characteristics of adalimumab users in RISE in 2023 overall and stratified by ever receipt of biosimilar (n=11,571).
*SMDs <0.2 were considered as ‘very small’, 0.2-0.5 ‘small’, 0.5-0.8 ‘medium’ and >0.8 ‘large’.

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Percent of patients receiving biosimilar adalimumab by practices with at least 20 patients (n=126). Each vertical column represents one practice in the RISE registry.

Disclaimer: This data was supported by the ACR’s RISE Registry. However, the views expressed represent those of the authors, not necessarily those of the ACR.


Disclosures: E. Roberts: None; G. Schmajuk: None; J. Yazdany: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Roberts E, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Very Low Uptake of Biosimilar Adalimumab in the First 9 Months of Availability in Rheumatology [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/very-low-uptake-of-biosimilar-adalimumab-in-the-first-9-months-of-availability-in-rheumatology/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/very-low-uptake-of-biosimilar-adalimumab-in-the-first-9-months-of-availability-in-rheumatology/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology