ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 886

Vascular Inflammation Assessed By 18f-Fludeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Is Modified By Treatment in Patients with Large Vessel Vasculitis

Shubhasree Dutta Choudhury1, Sara Alehashemi2, Mark Ahlman3, Ali Cahid Civelek3, Elaine Novakovich4, Ashkan Malayeri3, Thomas Cupps5, David A. Bluemke6 and Peter C. Grayson7, 1National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2Rheumatology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 3Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 4Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, NIAMS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 5Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, DC, 6National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 7National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Imaging and large vessel vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Vasculitis - Poster I: Large Vessel Vasculitis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   FDG-PET can be used to detect vascular inflammation in large vessel vasculitis (LVV). The study objective was to determine if therapies currently used to treat LVV impact vascular FDG uptake.

Methods:   Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK) were recruited into a prospective, observational cohort of LVV. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT at 6-month intervals (256 matrix, 3mm slice, 2 hour uptake time). Change in cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) dose between interval visits was calculated. Treatment status between interval visits was categorized as increased, decreased, or unchanged. Change in treatment was defined as change in average daily dose of prednisone over past 7 days by ≥ 5 mg, addition of a new DMARD or biologic agent or a 50% change from the baseline dose. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were measured in 3 regions: 1) ascending aorta and arch; 2) descending aorta; and 3) liver. Vascular FDG uptake was quantified as a target to background ratio (TBR) standardized to the liver (TBR = SUVmax Aorta Region / SUVmean Liver). Change in TBR in each region of the aorta was calculated between interval study visits. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare change in TBR across treatment status categories. Spearman correlation between change in TBR, change in cumulative GC dose, and change in methotrexate (MTX) dose was calculated. Linear regression was performed to evaluate relationship between change in MTX and GC dose with change in TBR.

Results:   FDG-PET/CT was performed in 20 patients with LVV (GCA=14; TAK=6) over 49 study visits. 15 patients were treated with GCs, 10 patients were treated with MTX, and 8 patients received another DMARD or biologic during the study. Increased therapy was recorded over 11 visit intervals, decreased treatment was noted in 5 visit intervals, and there was no change in therapy for 11 visit intervals. There was a simultaneous decrease in the GC dose with increase of DMARD over 2 treatment intervals, which were excluded from further analysis. Change in TBR of the descending aorta significantly differed among the 3 treatment categories (p=0.01). Post hoc analysis showed significant reduction in TBR in the group with increased treatment versus the unchanged treatment group. A similar trend was observed in the TBR of the ascending aorta and arch among the 3 treatment groups but differences between groups were less pronounced and did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08). There was no change in the SUVmean of the liver with change in treatment. Change in TBR of the descending aorta was inversely correlated with change in cumulative dosage of GC (r=-0.40, p=0.03) and with change in daily dose of methotrexate (r=-0.67; p=0.01). In multivariable regression, change in GC dose and change in methotrexate dose were independently associated with a change in TBR of the descending aorta (p<0.05).

Conclusion:   Therapies commonly used to treat LVV, including glucocorticoids and methotrexate, can reduce FDG vascular uptake in the aorta. Interval change in PET activity is more pronounced in the descending aorta compared to the ascending aorta and arch. FDG-PET might be useful to monitor vascular disease activity as an outcome measure in clinical trials of LVV.


Disclosure: S. Dutta Choudhury, None; S. Alehashemi, None; M. Ahlman, None; A. C. Civelek, None; E. Novakovich, None; A. Malayeri, None; T. Cupps, None; D. A. Bluemke, Siemens, 9; P. C. Grayson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dutta Choudhury S, Alehashemi S, Ahlman M, Civelek AC, Novakovich E, Malayeri A, Cupps T, Bluemke DA, Grayson PC. Vascular Inflammation Assessed By 18f-Fludeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Is Modified By Treatment in Patients with Large Vessel Vasculitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vascular-inflammation-assessed-by-18f-fludeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography-fdg-pet-is-modified-by-treatment-in-patients-with-large-vessel-vasculitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/vascular-inflammation-assessed-by-18f-fludeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography-fdg-pet-is-modified-by-treatment-in-patients-with-large-vessel-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology