ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 166

Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Semi-Quantitative Omeract Ultrasound Scoring System for Tenosynovitis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Mads Ammitzbøll-Danielsen1, Mikkel Østergaard2, Esperanza Naredo3 and Lene Terslev4, 1Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark, 2Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark, 3Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain, 4Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasound, Validity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I: Ultrasound, Optical Imaging and Capillaroscopy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Tenosynovitis is frequent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. One study indicates that tenosynovitis detected by modern imaging has prognostic value with respect to subsequent radiographic progression. The OMERACT ultrasound (US) study group has in 2012 proposed a new tenosynovitis scoring system. However, the validation of the score is limited, eg. the sensitivity to change during treatment has not been tested.

In a 6-months follow-up study of 51 RA patients with ultrasonographic tenosynovitis, initiating treatment intensification with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and/or biological treatment, to validate the semi-quantitative OMERACT US-scoring system of tenosynovitis by testing its interreader reliability, sensitivity to change, and comparison to clinical evaluation.

Methods:

Fifty-one RA patients, planned for treatment intensification, were included: 43 women (age: mean 55.6; standard deviation (SD) 13.1) and 8 men (mean 49.1; SD 9.34). Thirty-four patients were anti-rheumatoid factor positive and 30 had early RA (duration <1 year). US (by grey-scale (GS) and color Doppler (CD)) and clinical assessment of the flexor and extensor tendon sheaths of the clinically most affected hand and foot was performed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Tenosynovitis was assessed using the semi-quantitative scoring system (0-3) proposed by the OMERACT US group for GS and CD calculating a sum score (0-39) for each patient. In 20 patients, US was done independently by 2 physicians at baseline and 6 months, to assess the inter-observer agreement. A GE Logiq E9 with a linear 6-15 ML probe was used. CD frequency was 7.5 MHz, a pulse repetition frequency = 0.4 and gain just below the noise limit. The same Doppler settings were used for all examinations.  A binary score for clinical tendon involvement(0-1) was also performed at the same locations as the US score, with reference to published recommendations, calculating a sum score (0-13).

Results:

The interreader agreement, as assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was very good at baseline (Bas) and for changes (Ch) for GS sum scores (ICC Bas=0.89 ; Ch=0.89) and CD (ICC Bas=0.95 ; Ch=0.90) tenosynovitis. The smallest detectable change (SDC) for change in scores was 0.97 for GS and 0.93 for CD. Tenosynovitis scores had decreased significantly at months 3 and 6 (Table 1). The sensitivity to change, as expressed by the standardized response mean from month 0-6, was high for GS and CD tenosynovitis (0.90 and 0.76, respectively), and moderate (0.59) for the clinical score (Table 1).

Conclusion:

The semi-quantitative OMERACT ultrasound scoring system of tenosynovitis showed high inter-observer agreement and sensitivity to change for both GS and CD.


Disclosure: M. Ammitzbøll-Danielsen, None; M. Østergaard, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Centocor, GSK, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Schering-Plough, Roche, Takeda, UCB, and Wyeth, 5,Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Centocor, GSK, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Schering-Plough, Roche, Takeda, UCB, and Wyeth, 2; E. Naredo, None; L. Terslev, UCB, 8,Abbott Laboratories, 8,MSD, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ammitzbøll-Danielsen M, Østergaard M, Naredo E, Terslev L. Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Semi-Quantitative Omeract Ultrasound Scoring System for Tenosynovitis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validity-and-sensitivity-to-change-of-the-semi-quantitative-omeract-ultrasound-scoring-system-for-tenosynovitis-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validity-and-sensitivity-to-change-of-the-semi-quantitative-omeract-ultrasound-scoring-system-for-tenosynovitis-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology