ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1980

Validation Of The Fox-Walk Test In People With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Birgitta Nordgren1, Cecilia Fridén2, Eva Jansson3, Ted Österlund4, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten2, Christina H. Opava1 and Anette Rickenlund4,5, 1Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physical Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden, 2Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physical Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, SE 14183 Huddinge, Sweden, 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden, 4Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden, 5Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Aerobic, exercise, physical activity and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Imaging of Rheumatic Disease: Research Methodology

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Aerobic capacity tests are important to evaluate exercise programs and to encourage individuals to a physically active lifestyle. Maximum aerobic tests in a laboratory setting are expensive and not always feasible for people with RA. Therefore several self monitoring submaximal tests have been developed. The Fox-walk test was designed to make it possible for healthy individuals to monitor their aerobic capacity themselves. The test is performed on tracks of different lengths and are located at several public places throughout Sweden and some other European countries. The test has earlier been shown to be reliable in people with RA. The aim of our study was to validate the Fox-walk test against measured maximum oxygen uptake (measured VO2max) in people with RA.

Methods:

Twenty seven subjects (81% female), mean (SD) age 62 (8.1) diagnosed with RA since 17.2 (11.7) years, activity limitation with the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, (HAQ) 0.412 (0.421) and DAS 28, 2.44 (0.82) participated in the study. The subjects performed the measured VO2max (Alpha version 4.5, Jaeger, KFA-2028-01) and a 774 m Fox-walk test track within one week. To estimate VO2max, the walking time was recorded and age, gender, BMI, the height of the person and the topography of the track was taken into account.

Results:

Mean (SD) for the measured VO2max and the Fox-walk test was 33.2 (7.8) ml/kg/min and 44.2 (7.1) respectively. There was a significant difference between the two tests (p<0.0001). The correlation between the two tests was moderate, r = 0.52, (p = 0.006) and showed an overestimation of aerobic capacity in the Fox-walk test compared to the measured VO2max test.

Conclusion:

Since our earlier study showed high reliability of the Fox-walk test and the present study showed a moderate correlation compared to the measured VO2max test, it could be recommended as an easy way to monitor aerobic capacity without supervision from health professionals. However, most people were overestimated in the Fox-walk test and the formula could possibly be adjusted to people with RA.


Disclosure:

B. Nordgren,
None;

C. Fridén,
None;

E. Jansson,
None;

T. Österlund,
None;

W. J. A. Grooten,
None;

C. H. Opava,
None;

A. Rickenlund,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-the-fox-walk-test-in-people-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology