ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2928

Validation of New Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria

Martin Aringer1, Karen Costenbader2, Ralph Brinks3, Dimitrios Boumpas4, David Daikh5, David Jayne6, Diane L. Kamen7, Marta Mosca8, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman9, Josef S. Smolen10, David Wofsy11, Betty Diamond12, Søren Jacobsen13, W. Joseph McCune14, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza15, Matthias Schneider16, Murray Urowitz17, George Bertsias18, Bimba Hoyer19, Nicolai Leuchten1, Chiara Tani20, Sara K. Tedeschi21, Zahi Touma22, Branimir Anic23, Florence Assan24, Tak Mao Chan25, Ann E. Clarke26, Peggy Crow27, László Czirják28, Andrea Doria29, Winfried Graninger30, Bernadett Halda-Kiss28, Sarfaraz A. Hasni31, Peter M. Izmirly32, Michelle Jung33, Gabor Kumanovics28, Xavier Mariette24, Ivan Padjen23, JM Pego-Reigosa34, Juanita Romero-Díaz35, Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa36, Raphaele Seror37, Georg Stummvoll38, Yoshiya Tanaka39, Maria Tektonidou40, Carlos Vasconcelos41, Edward M Vital42, Daniel J. Wallace43, Sule Yavuz44, Raymond P. Naden45, Thomas Dörner46 and Sindhu Johnson47, 1Medicine III, University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2Rheumatology, Immunology and All, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany, 4University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 5Rheumatology, UCSF and VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 6Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 7Medicine/Rheumatology & Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 8Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 9FSM, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 10Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 11University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 12Autoimmune Musculoskeletal and Hematopoietic Diseases, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 13University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 14Int Med/ Rheum, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 15Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, BioCruces, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain, 16Department and Hiller Research Center for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany, 17University of Toronto Lupus Research Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 18Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of Crete, School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece, 19University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany, 20University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 21Rheumatology Immunology & Allergy, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 22University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 23Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zagreb and University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia, 24Université Paris Sud, Paris, France, 25University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 26Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 27Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 28Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 29University and Azienda Ospedaliera of Padova, Padova, Italy, 30Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 31Lupus Clinical Research Program, Office of the Clinical Director, NIH/NIAMS, Bethesda, MD, 32NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 33University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 34Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain, 35Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico, 36Rheumatology Division, Hospital Doctor Negrin, Las Palmas GC, Spain, 37Center for Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, INSERM, Paris, France, Paris, France, 38Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 39University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 40Rheumatology Unit, 1st Dept. of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece, 41Centro Hospitalar do Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 42University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 43Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 44Department of Rheumatology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, 45New Zealand Ministry of Health, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Auckland, New Zealand, 46Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 47Rheumatology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: SLE and classification criteria

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Title: 6W010 ACR Abstract: SLE–Clinical V: Biomarkers, Criteria, & Outcomes (2928–2933)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Correct classification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is critical for clinical trials and clinical and translational science. The ACR 1997 criteria were criticized for their suboptimal sensitivity. The Systemic Lupus International Cooperating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 criteria increased sensitivity, but at the price of reduced specificity. This and further advances in the field led to the current four phase SLE criteria project. Following an item generation phase and item reduction via a Delphi and a nominal group exercise (1), the provisional criteria were derived from a multicriteria decision analysis exercise (2). These criteria were hence simplified and validated in a large international cohort.

Methods: A large international cohort of 2,321 patients was collected from 23 SLE expert centers, contributing up to 100 patients with SLE and with non-SLE, each. Diagnoses were verified by 3 independent reviewers for 1,193 SLE and 1,059 non-SLE patients. 501 randomly selected SLE and 500 non-SLE patients formed the derivation cohort. All other patients with confirmed SLE or non-SLE diagnosis formed the validation cohort. Sensitivity and specificity were compared to the ACR 1997 and the SLICC 2012 criteria.

Results: The criteria were fine-tuned and simplified, using ANA of ≥1:80 as entry criterion and a classification threshold of 10. Items can only be counted for classification if there is no more likely cause, and at least one clinical item must be present.

Renal

Class III/IV nephritis

10

Class II/V nephritis

8

Proteinuria ≥0.5 g/day

4

Specific antibodies

Anti-Sm or

Anti-dsDNA

6

Muco-cutaneous

ACLE

6

SCLE or

DLE

4

Alopecia or

oral ulcers

2

Serosa

Acute pericarditis

6

Effusion

5

Musculo-skeletal

Arthritis

6

CNS

Seizures

5

Psychosis

3

Delirium

2

Blood

Autoimmune hemolysis or thrombocytopenia

4

Leukopenia

3

Complement

Low C3 and C4

4

Low C3 or C4

3

Anti-phospholipid

Anti-Cardiolipin or

anti-β2-GPI or

lupus anticoagulant

2

Constitutional

Fever

2

Sensitivity was close to the SLICC 2012 criteria, specificity maintained at the level of the ACR 1997 criteria. This performance was independently confirmed in the validation cohort.

ACR 1997 criteria

SLICC criteria

New criteria

Derivation

Sensitivity

84.63

96.81

98.00

Specificity

95.20

90.00

96.40

Validation

Sensitivity

82.76

96.70

96.12

Specificity

93.38

83.62

93.38

Conclusion: The novel set of criteria reached the goal of improved sensitivity close to the SLICC 2012 criteria, while maintaining the specificity of the ACR criteria.

Funding note: This project is jointly supported by the ACR and EULAR, but the final criteria have not yet been reviewed or approved by either organization.

References: (1) Aringer et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76 (S2):4; (2) Tedeschi et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017; 69 (S10):#1589


Disclosure: M. Aringer, None; K. Costenbader, Alkermes, 1,Cel-Sci Corp, 1,Merck & Co., 2,AstraZeneca, 5,NIH, 2,Lupus Foundation of America, 6,Pfizer, Inc., 9,GlaxoSmithKline, 5, 9; R. Brinks, None; D. Boumpas, None; D. Daikh, None; D. Jayne, None; D. L. Kamen, None; M. Mosca, None; R. Ramsey-Goldman, None; J. S. Smolen, None; D. Wofsy, None; B. Diamond, None; S. Jacobsen, None; W. J. McCune, None; G. Ruiz-Irastorza, None; M. Schneider, None; M. Urowitz, None; G. Bertsias, None; B. Hoyer, None; N. Leuchten, None; C. Tani, None; S. K. Tedeschi, None; Z. Touma, None; B. Anic, None; F. Assan, None; T. M. Chan, None; A. E. Clarke, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,AstraZeneca, 5,Exagen Diagnostics, 5,AstraZeneca, 9,Celgene Corporation, 9; P. Crow, None; L. Czirják, None; A. Doria, None; W. Graninger, None; B. Halda-Kiss, None; S. A. Hasni, None; P. M. Izmirly, None; M. Jung, None; G. Kumanovics, None; X. Mariette, None; I. Padjen, None; J. Pego-Reigosa, None; J. Romero-Díaz, None; I. Rúa-Figueroa, None; R. Seror, None; G. Stummvoll, None; Y. Tanaka, None; M. Tektonidou, None; C. Vasconcelos, None; E. M. Vital, None; D. J. Wallace, None; S. Yavuz, None; R. P. Naden, None; T. Dörner, None; S. Johnson, Roche, Bayer, Boehringer, BMS, NIH, Merck, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aringer M, Costenbader K, Brinks R, Boumpas D, Daikh D, Jayne D, Kamen DL, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Smolen JS, Wofsy D, Diamond B, Jacobsen S, McCune WJ, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Schneider M, Urowitz M, Bertsias G, Hoyer B, Leuchten N, Tani C, Tedeschi SK, Touma Z, Anic B, Assan F, Chan TM, Clarke AE, Crow P, Czirják L, Doria A, Graninger W, Halda-Kiss B, Hasni SA, Izmirly PM, Jung M, Kumanovics G, Mariette X, Padjen I, Pego-Reigosa J, Romero-Díaz J, Rúa-Figueroa I, Seror R, Stummvoll G, Tanaka Y, Tektonidou M, Vasconcelos C, Vital EM, Wallace DJ, Yavuz S, Naden RP, Dörner T, Johnson S. Validation of New Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-new-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-classification-criteria/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-new-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-classification-criteria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology